Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37040346›Full record

ArticleBiology of reproduction2023

Reprogramming efficiency and pluripotency of mule iPSCs over its parents†.

Jia Zhang, Lixia Zhao, Yuting Fu, Fangyuan Liu, Zixin Wang, Yunxia Li, Gaoping Zhao, Wei Sun, Baojiang Wu, Yongli Song and 12 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of reproduction, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Jia ZhangThe State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Lixia ZhaoCollege of Basic Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010110, China.
Yuting FuThe State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Fangyuan LiuResearch Center for Animal Genetic Resources of Mongolia Plateau, College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Zixin WangInner Mongolia Saikexing Institute of Breeding and Reproductive Biotechnology in Domestic Animal, Hohhot 011517, China.
Yunxia LiInner Mongolia Saikexing Institute of Breeding and Reproductive Biotechnology in Domestic Animal, Hohhot 011517, China.
Gaoping ZhaoInner Mongolia Saikexing Institute of Breeding and Reproductive Biotechnology in Domestic Animal, Hohhot 011517, China.
Wei SunInner Mongolia Saikexing Institute of Breeding and Reproductive Biotechnology in Domestic Animal, Hohhot 011517, China.
Baojiang WuThe State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Yongli SongThe State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Shaohua LiCollege of Basic Medicine, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010110, China.
Chunxia HaoThe State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Bilige WuyunThe State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Rihan WuThe State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Moning LiuKey Laboratory of Basic Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Guifang CaoKey Laboratory of Basic Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, China.
Buhe NashunThe State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
M Azim SuraniWellcome Trust/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute, Henry Wellcome Building of Cancer and Developmental Biology, Cambridge CB2 1QN, UK.
Qingyuan SunFertility Preservation Lab, Reproductive Medicine Center, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou 510317, China.
Siqin BaoThe State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Pentao LiuSchool of Biomedical Science, Stem Cell and Regenerative Consortium, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Xihe LiThe State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010020, China.
Inner Mongolia University · CNInner Mongolia Medical University · CNInner Mongolia Agricultural University · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNHong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation · CNWellcome/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mule is the interspecific hybrid of horse and donkey and has hybrid vigor in muscular endurance, disease resistance, and longevity over its parents. Here, we examined adult fibroblasts of mule (MAFs) compared with the cells from their parents (donkey adult fibroblasts and horse adult fibroblasts) (each species has repeated three independent individuals) in proliferation, apoptosis, and glycolysis and found significant differences. We subsequently derived mule, donkey, and horse doxycycline (Dox)-independent induced pluripotent stem cells (miPSCs, diPSCs, and hiPSCs) from three independent individuals of each species and found that the reprogramming efficiency of MAFs was significantly higher than that of cells of donkey and horse. miPSCs, diPSCs, and hiPSCs all expressed the high levels of crucial endogenous pluripotency genes such as POU class 5 homeobox 1 (POU5F1, OCT4), SRY-box 2 (SOX2), and Nanog homeobox (NANOG) and propagated robustly in single-cell passaging. miPSCs exhibited faster proliferation and higher pluripotency and differentiation than diPSCs and hiPSCs, which were reflected in co-cultures and separate-cultures, teratoma formation, and chimera contribution. The establishment of miPSCs provides a unique research material for the investigation of "heterosis" and perhaps is more significant to study hybrid gamete formation.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingEquidaeFibroblastsHorsesOctamer Transcription Factor-3Octamer Transcription Factor-3donkeyhorseiPSCsmulepluripotency

Identifiers

PMID37040346
PMCPMC10266948
OpenAlexW4364353500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.