ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023
From Prototype to Inference: A Pipeline to Apply Deep Learning in Sorghum Panicle Detection.
Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Remote sensing data and machine learning models estimate sorghum grain yield in a plant breeding program.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Application of deep learning in crop research: From genomics to phenomics.The plant genome · 2026Review
- Deep learning for sorghum yield forecasting using uncrewed aerial systems and lab-derived imagery.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Counting Canola: Toward Generalizable Aerial Plant Detection Models.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Combining High-Resolution Imaging, Deep Learning, and Dynamic Modeling to Separate Disease and Senescence in Wheat Canopies.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head (panicle) density is a major component in understanding crop yield, especially in crops that produce variable numbers of tillers such as sorghum and wheat. Use of panicle density both in plant breeding and in the agronomy scouting of commercial crops typically relies on manual counts observation, which is an inefficient and tedious process. Because of the easy availability of red-green-blue images, machine learning approaches have been applied to replacing manual counting. However, much of this research focuses on detection per se in limited testing conditions and does not provide a general protocol to utilize deep-learning-based counting. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive pipeline from data collection to model deployment in deep-learning-assisted panicle yield estimation for sorghum. This pipeline provides a basis from data collection and model training, to model validation and model deployment in commercial fields. Accurate model training is the foundation of the pipeline. However, in natural environments, the deployment dataset is frequently different from the training data (domain shift) causing the model to fail, so a robust model is essential to build a reliable solution. Although we demonstrate our pipeline in a sorghum field, the pipeline can be generalized to other grain species. Our pipeline provides a high-resolution head density map that can be utilized for diagnosis of agronomic variability within a field, in a pipeline built without commercial software.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.