ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Accurate flux predictions using tissue-specific gene expression in plant metabolic modeling.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atomic elementary flux modes explain the steady state flow of metabolites in large-scale flux networks.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Article
- Metabolic Engineering Strategy forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Non-canonical plant metabolism.Nature plants · 2025Review
- COMO: a pipeline for multi-omics data integration in metabolic modeling and drug discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Article
- Predicting metabolic fluxes from omics data via machine learning: Moving from knowledge-driven towards data-driven approaches.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Model validation and selection in metabolic flux analysis and flux balance analysis.Biotechnology progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe accurate prediction of complex phenotypes such as metabolic fluxes in living systems is a grand challenge for systems biology and central to efficiently identifying biotechnological interventions that can address pressing industrial needs. The application of gene expression data to improve the accuracy of metabolic flux predictions using mechanistic modeling methods such as flux balance analysis (FBA) has not been previously demonstrated in multi-tissue systems, despite their biotechnological importance. We hypothesized that a method for generating metabolic flux predictions informed by relative expression levels between tissues would improve prediction accuracy.
resultsRelative gene expression levels derived from multiple transcriptomic and proteomic datasets were integrated into FBA predictions of a multi-tissue, diel model of Arabidopsis thaliana's central metabolism. This integration dramatically improved the agreement of flux predictions with experimentally based flux maps from 13C metabolic flux analysis compared with a standard parsimonious FBA approach. Disagreement between FBA predictions and MFA flux maps was measured using weighted averaged percent error values, and for parsimonious FBA this was169%-180% for high light conditions and 94%-103% for low light conditions, depending on the gene expression dataset used. This fell to 10%-13% and 9%-11% upon incorporating expression data into the modeling process, which also substantially altered the predicted carbon and energy economy of the plant. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and data generated as part of this study are available from https://github.com/Gibberella/ArabidopsisGeneExpressionWeights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.