Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37039979›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2023

Quantitative Prediction of Posttransplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Prognosis Using ADV Score: Validation with Korea-Nationwide Transplantation Registry Database.

Gil-Chun Park, Shin Hwang, Young Kyoung You, YoungRok Choi, Jong Man Kim, Dong Jin Joo, Je Ho Ryu, Donglak Choi, Bong-Wan Kim, Dong-Sik Kim and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diagnostic and prognostic performance ofClinical transplantation and research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gil-Chun ParkDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Olympic-ro 43-gil 88, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1631-3258
Shin HwangDepartment of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Olympic-ro 43-gil 88, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. shwang@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-2531
Young Kyoung YouDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Banpodae-ro 222, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 06591, Korea. yky602@catholic.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-7363-8131
YoungRok ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2408-7086
Jong Man KimDepartment of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1903-8354
Dong Jin JooDepartment of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8405-1531
Je Ho RyuDepartment of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9377-3074
Donglak ChoiDepartment of Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6071-9012
Bong-Wan KimDepartment of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9059-0451
Dong-Sik KimDivision of HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0608-1580
Yang Won NahDepartment of Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8161-9849
Koo Jeong KangDepartment of Surgery, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1385-8308
Jai Young ChoDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1376-956X
Hee Chul YuDepartment of Surgery, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2766-1354
Deok Gie KimDepartment of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9653-926X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study is to validate the prognostic impact of ADV score (α-fetoprotein [AFP]-des-γ-carboxyprothrombin [DCP]-tumor volume [TV] score) for predicting prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following liver transplantation (LT).

backgroundADV score has been reported as a prognostic surrogate biomarker of HCC following LT and hepatectomy.

methodsThe study patients were 1599 LT recipients selected from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry database.

resultsDeceased-donor and living-donor LTs were performed in 143 and 1456 cases, respectively. Weak correlation was present among AFP, DCP, and TV. The viable HCC group showed ADV score-dependent disease-free survival (DFS) and overall patient survival (OS) rates from 1log to 10log (p<0.001). Prognosis of complete pathological response group was comparable to that of ADV score <1log (p≥0.099). ADV score cutoff of 5log (ADV-5log) for DFS and OS was obtained through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with area under the curve ≥0.705. Both ADV-5log and Milan criteria were independent risk factors for DFS and OS, and their prognostic impacts were comparable to each other. Combination of these two factors resulted in further prognostic stratification, showing hazard ratios for DFS and OS as 2.98 and 2.26 respectively for one risk factor and 7.92 and 8.19 respectively for two risk factors (p<0.001). ABO-incompatible recipients with ADV score ≥8log or two risk factors showed higher recurrence rates.

conclusionsThis validation study revealed that ADV score is a reliable surrogate biomarker for posttransplant HCC prognosis, which can be used for selecting LT candidates and guiding risk-based posttransplant follow-up surveillance.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver Neoplasmsalpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkersHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsalpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkersHepatocellular carcinomaPredictionPrognosisTumor biologyTumor marker

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.