ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023
[MRI or ultrasound-which imaging technique do we need?]
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary End-to-End Repair of Subacute Extensor Hallucis Longus Tendon Rupture Supported by a Preserved Extensor Hallucis Capsularis: A Case Report.Case reports in orthopedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnostic imaging of epicondylitis is primarily performed using widely available, radiation-free ultrasound. The dynamic examination allows a rapid point-of-care assessment. Typical imaging findings of epicondylitis include intratendinous hypoechogenic foci at the humeral origin, ossification at the enthesis, intratendinous calcifications, or (partial) rupture. In particular, Doppler sonography increases sensitivity by assessing possible neovascularization within the tendon. When sonographic findings are unclear or extensive, or when ultrasound machines or the required expertise in elbow examinations are not available, magnetic resonance imaging is indicated. Here, the use of proton density-weighted sequences is appropriate for assessing bone marrow and soft tissue edema and tendon tears, while ossifications are best delineated in T1weighted sequences. Projection radiography and computed tomography can be helpful for larger ossifications, although they are not part of the standard imaging protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.