ArticleDer Nervenarzt2023
[Temporary and persistent visual phenomena in neurology].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporary and persistent visual phenomena are a frequent reason for a neurological presentation. The diagnosis can usually be made with the help of a structured anamnesis with determination of the time of onset, the course and symptoms as well as the monocular vs. binocular manifestation. The visual aura in migraine is certainly the most frequent entity to be differentiated. In particular, persistent visual phenomena such as visual snow syndrome, hallucinogen persisting perception disorder and the Charles Bonnet syndrome (CBS) seem to be underdiagnosed in clinical practice for various reasons and are probably not that rare. Instrumental diagnostics are mostly used for exclusion diagnostics and are a component of a complete patient education, but can be indicative for certain questions (CBS, epilepsy). This article presents the most frequent visual phenomena from the neurological practice and their differential diagnoses, guided by a case history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.