Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37039847›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2023

Development and evaluation of a blocking ELISA for serological diagnosis of equine infectious anemia.

Zhe Hu, Kui Guo, Cheng Du, Jinhui Sun, Ivancho Naletoski, Xiaoyu Chu, Yuezhi Lin, Xuefeng Wang, Maria Barrandeguy, Miño Samuel and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vector-borne diseases-knowledge maps.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  2. A Label-Free blocking immunoassay to evaluate Anti-Adalimumab antibody activity in clinical samples.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Zhe Hu *State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Kui Guo *State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Cheng Du *State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Jinhui Sun *State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Ivancho NaletoskiAnimal Production and Health Section, Joint FAO/IAEA Centre for Nuclear Applications in Food and Agriculture, Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
Xiaoyu ChuState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Yuezhi LinState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Xuefeng WangState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China.
Maria BarrandeguyInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Virología, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Miño SamuelInstituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Virología, Pilar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Wen WangAnimal Health Supervision Institute of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
Patrick Imtung LauEquine Disease Division, Agriculture Fisheries and Conservation Department, Hong Kong, China.
Ulrich WerneryCentral Veterinary Research Laboratory, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Rekha RaghavanCentral Veterinary Research Laboratory, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Xiaojun WangState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China. wangxiaojun@caas.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4521-4099
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNCentral Veterinary Research Laboratory · AELaboratoire National de Référence · MAAgriculture Fisheries and Conservation Department · CNInternational Atomic Energy Agency · ATNational Agricultural Technology Institute · ARNortheast Agricultural University · CNUniversidad del Salvador · AR

Funding

the National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFD1800500the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFD1800200the Nature Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Provience, China JJ2022TD2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Equine infectious anemia (EIA) is an important viral disease characterized by persistent infection in equids worldwide. Most EIA cases are life-long virus carriers with low antibody reactions and without the appearance of clinical symptoms. A serological test with high sensitivity and specificity is required to detect inapparent infection. In this study, a B-cell common epitope-based blocking ELISA (bELISA) was developed using a monoclonal antibody together with the EIAV p26 protein labelled with HRP. The test has been evaluated against the standard and with field serum samples globally. This bELISA test can be completed within 75 min, and the sensitivity is higher than those of either the AGID or one commercial cELISA kit. This bELISA assay was 8-16 times more analytically sensitive than AGID, and 2 to 4 times more analytically sensitive than one cELISA kit by testing three sera from the USA, Argentina, and China, respectively. The 353 serum samples from Argentina were tested, in comparison with AGID, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of our bELISA assay were 100% (154/154) and 97.0% (193/199), respectively, and the accuracy of the bELISA test was 98.3%. The bELISA test developed in this study is a rapid, sensitive, specific method for the detection of EIAV infection, and could be a promising candidate for use in the monitoring of the EIA epidemic worldwide. KEY POINTS: • A universal epitope-based blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (bELISA) was developed for detection of antibodies to EIAV. • The bELISA assay can be used to test EIAV serum samples from different regions of the world including North America, South America, Europe, and Asia. • The bELISA assay was evaluated in three different international labs and showed a better performance than other commercial kits.

Indexed as

Equine Infectious AnemiaInfectious Anemia Virus, EquineAnimalsAntibodies, ViralEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEpitopes, B-LymphocyteHorsesSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsAntibodies, ViralEpitopes, B-LymphocyteAGIDBlocking ELISAEIAVEpitopeEquine infectious anemiaP26

Identifiers

PMID37039847
OpenAlexW4364354545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.