ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Population-based change-point detection for the identification of homozygosity islands.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reflections on the Human Genome Diversity Project: a conversation with Marcus W. Feldman, Henry T. Greely, and Mary-Claire King.Genetics · 2026Article
- The roles of FLOT1 in human diseases (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2023Review
- Prognostic and immunological potential of PPM1G in lung adenocarcinoma.Molecular medicine reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationThis work is motivated by the problem of identifying homozygosity islands on the genome of individuals in a population. Our method directly tackles the issue of identification of the homozygosity islands at the population level, without the need of analysing single individuals and then combine the results, as is made nowadays in state-of-the-art approaches.
resultsWe propose regularized offline change-point methods to detect changes in the parameters of a multidimensional distribution when we have several aligned, independent samples of fixed resolution. We present a penalized maximum likelihood approach that can be efficiently computed by a dynamic programming algorithm or approximated by a fast binary segmentation algorithm. Both estimators are shown to converge almost surely to the set of change-points without the need of specifying a priori the number of change-points. In simulation, we observed similar performances from the exact and greedy estimators. Moreover, we provide a new methodology for the selection of the regularization constant which has the advantage of being automatic, consistent, and less prone to subjective analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data used in the application are from the Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP) and is publicly available. Algorithms were implemented using the R software R Core Team (R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020.) in the R package blockcpd, found at https://github.com/Lucas-Prates/blockcpd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.