Trial reportJAMA2023
Heterogeneity in Blood Pressure Response to 4 Antihypertensive Drugs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02774460 (The Precision Hypertension Care Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Precision Hypertension Care Study
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- The potential of precision diabetology for type 2 diabetes treatment-evidence from a meta-regression for all-cause mortality from large cardiovascular outcome trials.Acta diabetologica · 2025Pooled it
- Self-measurement of blood pressure at home using a cuff device for change in blood pressure levels: systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Pooled it
- Renal sympathetic denervation 2024 in Austria: recommendations from the Austrian Society of Hypertension : Endorsed by the Austrian Society of Nephrology and the Working Group of Interventional Cardiology of the Austrian Society of Cardiology.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2024Guideline
- Consistency of Blood Pressure Response to Potassium-Enriched Salt in the China Salt Substitute Study.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Are there interindividual differences in the reactive hypoglycaemia response to breakfast? A replicate crossover trial.European journal of nutrition · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Type 2 diabetes subtypes for precision medicine: methodological challenges and alternative prediction-based approaches.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- Too much, too soon? The argument against initial combination therapy in stage I hypertension.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Review
- Short-term effects of combinations of heart failure therapies on blood pressure, kidney function and serum potassium.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Why wait? the case for up-front single-pill combination therapy in stage 1 hypertension.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Review
- Personalised approach to hypertension treatment: protocol for the HYPERMARKER randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Article
- Five tenets for advancing evidence-based precision medicine.Nature medicine · 2026Review
- Trends in first-line monotherapy and combination therapy for hypertension in UK primary care.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Tailored Therapeutic Strategies for Fetuses, Neonates, Pediatrics, Geriatrics, Athletes, and Critical Cases in the Era of Personalized Medicine.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Wearable Hyperspectral Photoplethysmography Allows Continuous Monitoring of Exercise-Induced Hypertension.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Increased Entropy Predicts Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk and Hypertension: A Novel Imaging Parameter Derived from Late Gadolinium Enhancement.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- The Lancet Commission on rethinking coronary artery disease: moving from ischaemia to atheroma.Lancet (London, England) · 2025Review
- Harnessing n-of-1 trials for personalised paediatric care in the era of information overload.The Lancet. Child & adolescent health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Hypertension is the leading risk factor for premature death worldwide. Multiple blood pressure-lowering therapies are available but the potential for maximizing benefit by personalized targeting of drug classes is unknown. Objective: To investigate and quantify the potential for targeting specific drugs to specific individuals to maximize blood pressure effects. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, double-blind, repeated crossover trial in men and women with grade 1 hypertension at low risk for cardiovascular events at an outpatient research clinic in Sweden. Mixed-effects models were used to assess the extent to which individuals responded better to one treatment than another and to estimate the additional blood pressure lowering achievable by personalized treatment. Interventions: Each participant was scheduled for treatment in random order with 4 different classes of blood pressure-lowering drugs (lisinopril [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor], candesartan [angiotensin-receptor blocker], hydrochlorothiazide [thiazide], and amlodipine [calcium channel blocker]), with repeated treatments for 2 classes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ambulatory daytime systolic blood pressure, measured at the end of each treatment period. Results: There were 1468 completed treatment periods (median length, 56 days) recorded in 270 of the 280 randomized participants (54% men; mean age, 64 years). The blood pressure response to different treatments varied considerably between individuals (P < .001), specifically for the choices of lisinopril vs hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril vs amlodipine, candesartan vs hydrochlorothiazide, and candesartan vs amlodipine. Large differences were excluded for the choices of lisinopril vs candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide vs amlodipine. On average, personalized treatment had the potential to provide an additional 4.4 mm Hg-lower systolic blood pressure. Conclusions and Relevance: These data reveal substantial heterogeneity in blood pressure response to drug therapy for hypertension, findings that may have implications for personalized therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02774460.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.