Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37039792›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2023

Heterogeneity in Blood Pressure Response to 4 Antihypertensive Drugs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Johan Sundström, Lars Lind, Shamim Nowrouzi, Emil Hagström, Claes Held, Per Lytsy, Bruce Neal, Kerstin Marttala, Ollie Östlund

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02774460 (The Precision Hypertension Care Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02774460 phase4completednot on this map

The Precision Hypertension Care Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2017 to 2021Enrolled280ConditionsHypertensionArmsZestril®, Atacand®, Norvasc®, Hydrochlorthiazide®, Treatment X
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johan SundströmDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lars LindDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Shamim NowrouziDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Emil HagströmDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Claes HeldDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Per LytsyDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Bruce NealThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kerstin MarttalaDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ollie ÖstlundUppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEThe George Institute for Global Health · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Hypertension is the leading risk factor for premature death worldwide. Multiple blood pressure-lowering therapies are available but the potential for maximizing benefit by personalized targeting of drug classes is unknown. Objective: To investigate and quantify the potential for targeting specific drugs to specific individuals to maximize blood pressure effects. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, double-blind, repeated crossover trial in men and women with grade 1 hypertension at low risk for cardiovascular events at an outpatient research clinic in Sweden. Mixed-effects models were used to assess the extent to which individuals responded better to one treatment than another and to estimate the additional blood pressure lowering achievable by personalized treatment. Interventions: Each participant was scheduled for treatment in random order with 4 different classes of blood pressure-lowering drugs (lisinopril [angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor], candesartan [angiotensin-receptor blocker], hydrochlorothiazide [thiazide], and amlodipine [calcium channel blocker]), with repeated treatments for 2 classes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ambulatory daytime systolic blood pressure, measured at the end of each treatment period. Results: There were 1468 completed treatment periods (median length, 56 days) recorded in 270 of the 280 randomized participants (54% men; mean age, 64 years). The blood pressure response to different treatments varied considerably between individuals (P < .001), specifically for the choices of lisinopril vs hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril vs amlodipine, candesartan vs hydrochlorothiazide, and candesartan vs amlodipine. Large differences were excluded for the choices of lisinopril vs candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide vs amlodipine. On average, personalized treatment had the potential to provide an additional 4.4 mm Hg-lower systolic blood pressure. Conclusions and Relevance: These data reveal substantial heterogeneity in blood pressure response to drug therapy for hypertension, findings that may have implications for personalized therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02774460.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHypertensionAmlodipineAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundsCalcium Channel BlockersCross-Over StudiesDiureticsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansHydrochlorothiazideLisinoprilAmlodipineAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBiphenyl CompoundsCalcium Channel BlockerscandesartanDiureticsHydrochlorothiazideLisinoprilTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID37039792
PMCPMC10091169
OpenAlexW4364352257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.