ArticleRadiation research2023
Varied Photon Radiation Sources Produce Differences in Cellular Response.
Article in Radiation research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Responses of the carotid artery to acute, fractionated or chronic ionizing irradiation, and differences from the aorta.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In vitro studies allow evaluation of normal or cancer cell responses to radiation, either alone or in combination with agents used to modify these biological responses. Ionizing radiation can be produced by a variety of particles and sources, with varying energy spectra, interaction probabilities, linear energy transfer, dose uniformity, dose rates, and delivery methods. Multiple radiation sources have been used to irradiate cells in the published literature. However, the equivalence of response in cell culture models across radiation sources has not been rigorously established. Moreover, current reporting of radiation source parameters lacks consistency and rigor which may impact the reproducibility of pre-clinical data between laboratories. Relevant choices of radiation source are also of high importance due to growing interest in comparing photon versus particle radiation effect on biological responses. Therefore, this study robustly evaluates the cellular response (cell survival, apoptosis, and DNA damage) of three distinct cell lines using four unique photon generating radiation sources. We hypothesize there may be subtle differences across the radiation sources, without an appreciable difference in cellular response. The four photon irradiation energies investigated, 662 keV, 100 kVp, 220 kVp, 6 MV, did produce subtle differences in DNA damage and cell survival when treating three distinct tumor cell lines. These variations in cellular response emphasize the need to carefully consider irradiation source, energy, and dose rate depending on study goal and endpoint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.