Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37039442›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols2023

The Track-by-Day Method for Monitoring the Rodent Estrous Cycle.

Gianna M Raimondi, Rebecca Tripp, Linnaea E Ostroff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gianna M RaimondiDepartment of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Rebecca TrippDepartment of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Linnaea E OstroffDepartment of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

A versatile approach for highly multiplexed, high-resolution imaging of endogenous moleculesRF1MH130472 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI OSTROFF, LINNAEA E · 2022 to 2022
$2.2M
National Science Foundation 2014862NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH130472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exclusion of female subjects from preclinical neuroscience research has traditionally been justified in part by concerns about potential effects of cycling ovarian hormones on brain function. There is evidence that some behavioral and neurobiological measures do change over the estrous cycle and, as the use of female subjects becomes increasingly routine, there is a greater demand for accessible cycle-tracking methods. Conventional estrous cycle staging requires expert training in the qualitative interpretation of vaginal cytology smears, which serves as a barrier for novice researchers. In addition, definitions and reporting practices are not standardized across laboratories, which makes it difficult to compare results across studies and likely contributes to a false perception of the cycle as ephemeral and inconsistent. Here, we describe a streamlined method for monitoring the estrous cycle in rats, which we term Track-by-Day. It is simple to implement and inherently produces consistent reporting. Our protocol should serve to demystify and facilitate adoption of cycle tracking for those new to the practice. © 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Collection and staining of vaginal smears Basic Protocol 2: Track-by-Day classification of vaginal smears Support Protocol: Preparation of gelatin-subbed slides.

Indexed as

Estrous CycleRodentiaAnimalsCytological TechniquesFemaleGelatinRatsStaining and LabelingGelatinestrous cyclefemale subjectssex differencesvaginal cytology

Identifiers

PMID37039442
PMCPMC11259016
OpenAlexW4364353840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.