ArticleCancer medicine2023
Safety and efficacy of GEMOX plus donafenib and tislelizumab as first-line therapy for advanced epithelial malignant biliary tract cancer.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chinese national clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract cancers.Chinese medical journal · 2024Guideline
- Chemotherapy combined with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a single arm phase II trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Trial
- Hyponatremia predicts immunotherapy resistance in biliary tract cancer.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Research progress on immune checkpoint inhibitors in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Safety and efficacy of GEMOX plus donafenib and tislelizumab as first-line therapy for advanced epithelial malignant biliary tract cancer.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study was aimed to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) combined with donafenib plus tislelizumab as the first-line treatment for patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC).
methodsThis is a prospective single-center exploratory study. Eligible patients (Stage III/IV BTC, at least one measurable disease according to RECIST v1.1, etc.) received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m
resultsA total of 13 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 420 days (range 345-487). The median duration of treatment was four cycles (range 1-15). The incidence of ≥Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 53.8% and no Grade 5 TRAE. The most frequent Grade 3-4 TRAEs were rash (4/13, 30.8%), platelet count decreased (2/13, 15.4%), and fatigue (2/13, 15.4%). Tumor response was assessed in eight evaluable patients; ORR was 25.0% (95% CI, 3.2%-65.1%) and DCR 87.5% (95% CI, 47.3%-99.7%). The median PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 1.25-NE). Three Stage III patients underwent subsequent surgery with a conversion rate of 23.1%. The median OS was not estimable.
conclusionsGEMOX combined with donafenib plus tislelizumab as the first-line therapy for unresectable BTC showed manageable toxicity and encouraging efficacy especially in terms of promising conversion rate in Stage III patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.