Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37038919›Full record

ArticleFamily process2023

Recruiting and retaining sexual and gender minority couples in intervention research: Lessons learned from trials of tailored relationship education programs.

Sarah W Whitton, Elissa L Sarno, Kyle Josza, Christopher P Garcia, Michael E Newcomb

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family process, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah W WhittonUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6566-1219
Elissa L SarnoInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1946-0288
Kyle JoszaInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Christopher P GarciaInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Michael E NewcombInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8431-2946
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Cincinnati · US

Funding

Effectiveness of Relationship Education for Reducing HIV Incidence in Young MenU01AI156874 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Michael E Newcomb · 2021 to 2026
$8.4M
Intimate Partner Violence in Sexual Minority Female Adolescents and Young AdultsR01HD086170 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI WHITTON, SARAH W · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
Efficacy of Couples-Based HIV Prevention in Vulnerable Young MenR01AA024065 · NIAAA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI NEWCOMB, MICHAEL E · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
A New Approach to Integrating Primary and Secondary HIV Prevention in Young Male CouplesDP2DA042417 · NIDA · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI NEWCOMB, MICHAEL E · 2016 to 2016
$2.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024065NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI156874NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086170NIDA NIH HHS DP2 DA042417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relationship interventions, including healthy relationship education, couple therapy, and dyadic approaches to treating mental and physical health issues, hold promise for promoting relationship and individual health among sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations. Because SGM couples live within a context of societal stigma against their minority identities and relationships, they are likely to be best served by targeted, culturally sensitive relationship interventions that are affirming, free of hetero- and cis-normativity, and address the unique stigma-based challenges that they face. Therefore, a key goal for the field today is to conduct research evaluating and refining newly developed relationship interventions designed specifically for SGM couples. In this paper, we offer recommendations for effectively recruiting and retaining large, diverse samples of SGM couples for clinical trials of tailored relationship interventions, grounded in guidelines for psychological practice and conducting research with SGM populations. Throughout, we offer examples and lessons learned from our experiences conducting clinical trials of tailored SGM relationship education programs. We encourage the use of recruitment and retention strategies that involve members of the target SGM community from the outset, are informed by knowledge about SGM individuals and relationships, use currently preferred language for individual identities and relationships, attend to issues of confidentiality regarding sexual/gender identity or relationship involvement, and adhere to the norms of the particular community and recruitment venue.

Indexed as

Gender IdentitySexual and Gender MinoritiesFemaleHeterosexualityHumansMaleSexual BehaviorSocial Stigmacultural competencyLGBTrelationship interventionssexual and gender minority

Identifiers

PMID37038919
PMCPMC11781047
OpenAlexW4364352334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.