Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37038761›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2023

Human rights promotion and the 'Geneva impasse' in mental healthcare: scoping review.

Bernadette McSherry, Piers Gooding, Yvette Maker

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The World Psychiatric Association calls for action on supporting alternatives to coercion in mental health care.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026
    Article
  4. Finding the balance between respecting autonomy and life-saving anorexia nervosa care: an Australian perspective.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bernadette McSherryMelbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-0110
Piers GoodingMelbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Yvette MakerFaculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Psychiatric Association recently emphasised that the protection of human rights in mental healthcare was a 'central concern'. This paper examines recent literature on human rights and mental healthcare.

aimsTo (a) outline how international human rights law distinguishes between the protection and promotion of human rights; and (b) explore the literature on promoting human rights in mental healthcare which avoids what has been termed the 'Geneva impasse' between those who argue that compulsory care and treatment can never comply with human rights law and those who argue that they can if certain conditions are met.

methodThe following doctrinal methodology was used: (a) identification and detailed analysis of international human rights conventions and commentaries; (b) identification of key literature on human rights and mental healthcare; and (c) critical analysis of key issues emerging from the literature.

resultsMuch of the literature on human rights and mental healthcare focuses on whether restrictions on compulsory care are required to meet the requirements of United Nations Conventions. There is an emerging literature identifying measures to promote the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of mental health.

conclusionsThere has been a focus on protecting the rights to liberty and equality before the law for mental health patients. The nascent literature on promoting human rights in mental healthcare could mark a way forward beyond the 'Geneva impasse' that has dominated public debate in recent years.

Indexed as

coercioncompulsory treatmentConvention on the Rights of Persons with DisabilitiesHuman rightspositive and negative rights

Identifiers

PMID37038761
PMCPMC10134324
OpenAlexW4364354103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.