Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37038561›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

A Gelatinous Pleural Effusion as a Diagnostic Clue.

Daniela Barroso, Rita Rego

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Case Report: Infection withFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela BarrosoInternal Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, PRT.
Rita RegoInternal Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, PRT.
Hospital de Santo António · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pleural effusion is a common presentation of several pathologies, and the determination of its cause is facilitated by macroscopic, biochemical, microbiological, and cellular analysis. A systematic approach to analyzing the fluid allows for a reduction in clinical diagnoses. Only a select number of diagnoses can be established definitively by thoracentesis, including effusions because of malignancy. We report the case of an 84-year-old male with a right large-volume pleural effusion with an initial diagnostic thoracocentesis demonstrating an exudate with a gelatinous appearance and exudate characteristics. The physical characteristics of the pleural effusion quickly raised the suspicion of mesothelioma, a rare tumor associated with a poor prognosis. In most diseases related to pleural effusion, fluid analysis yields important diagnostic information, and in certain cases, fluid analysis alone is enough for diagnosis. Malignant pleural mesothelioma may present as a viscous pleural effusion with gelatinous characteristics, which may immediately raise suspicion and contribute as a diagnostic clue in the initial study of a pleural effusion. This article was previously presented as a meeting abstract at the 28º Congresso Nacional de Medicina Interna in October 2022.

Indexed as

gelatinous pleural effusionmalignant pleural effusionmesotheliomapleural effusionthoracocentesis

Identifiers

PMID37038561
PMCPMC10082622
OpenAlexW4323660252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.