ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2023
Automatic granular and spinous epidermal cell identification and analysis on
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of facial skin ageing in healthy Asian and Caucasian females quantified by in vivo line-field confocal optical coherence tomography 3D imaging.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024Article
- DermoGAN: multi-task cycle generative adversarial networks for unsupervised automatic cell identification onJournal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) allows for real-time Aim: We aim to design an automated pipeline for the analysis of the structure of the epidermis from RCM images of the Approach: We identified the region of interest containing the epidermal cells and the individual cells in the segmented tissue area using tubeness filters to highlight membranes. We used prior biological knowledge on cell size to process the resulting detected cells, removing cells that were too small and reapplying the used filters locally on detected regions that were too big to be considered a single cell. The proposed full image analysis pipeline (FIAP) was compared with machine learning-based approaches (cell cutter, different U-Net configurations, and loss functions). Results: All methods were evaluated both on simulated data (four images) and on manually annotated RCM data (seven images). Accuracy was measured using recall and precision metrics. Both accuracy metrics were higher in the proposed FIAP for both real ( Conclusions: We showed that automatic cell segmentation can be achieved using a pipeline based on membrane detection, with an accuracy that matches expert manual cell identification. To our knowledge, this is the first method based on membrane detection to study healthy skin using RCM images evaluated against manually identified cell positions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.