Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37038434›Full record

ArticleSAGE open

Can Trust Bring Satisfaction to the Festival Under Pandemic?

Jiamin Liu, Eusebio Chiahsin Leou, Chaozhan Chen, Xi Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiamin LiuChengdu University of Information Technology, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1411-1142
Eusebio Chiahsin LeouCity University of Macau, Taipa, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3763-255X
Chaozhan ChenCity University of Macau, Taipa, China.
Xi LiCity University of Macau, Taipa, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3519-4805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In existing festival research, trust is often placed at the post-experience stage by scholars, and there is no research to explore the relationship between festivalscape, trust, and experience. In addition, the main function of trust is to reduce uncertainty and risk perception. Existing festival-related research scenarios do not have typical risks, which will limit the findings of the research. This research focuses on festivals under covid-19 pandemic, which is a typical risky scenario. Exploring the antecedent variables and the consequences of the trust of the festival participants in this context may therefore make up the deficiency of existing research. Several interesting findings have been made: the perception of the festivalscape during the pandemic has been significantly simplified. Epidemic prevention measures and staff may increase trust, but trust cannot have a direct and significant impact on festival satisfaction. While staff positively strengthen trust, they will have a significant negative impact on satisfaction.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicexperience qualityfestivalscapeMacau Light Festivalsatisfactiontrust

Identifiers

PMID37038434
PMCPMC10076181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.