ReviewCureus2023
Overview of Early ChatGPT's Presence in Medical Literature: Insights From a Hybrid Literature Review by ChatGPT and Human Experts.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The emergence of large language models as tools in literature reviews: a large language model-assisted systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring the role of ChatGPT in patient care (diagnosis and treatment) and medical research: A systematic review.Health promotion perspectives · 2023Pooled it
- Saudi Medical Students' Perceptions and Attitudes of Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence Integration in Medical Education: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- The landscape of artificial intelligence tools and platforms for evidence synthesis: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Psychological Inclinations and Practical Utility of ChatGPT Among Undergraduate Dental Students at a Dental School in Karachi: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Assessing Large Language Models for Early Article Identification in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Systematic Reviews.Health care science · 2026Article
- Building a new ecosystem for digital-intelligent teaching of veterinary infectious diseases in southwest Chinese universities: theoretical framework and practical pathways.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- The Application of Flipped Classroom Integrated with ChatGPT in Improving Graduate Education on Choroidal Melanoma.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Readability and Quality of Bladder Cancer Information from AI Chatbots: A Comparative Study Between ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Grok, Claude and DeepSeek.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Applications, Challenges, and Prospects of Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowering Medical Education: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Advantages and Limitations of ChatGPT in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence Versus Professional Standards: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of GPT, Gemini, and ENT UK in Delivering Patient Information on ENT Conditions.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Accuracy, readability, and understandability of large language models for prostate cancer information to the public.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Article
- Application of ChatGPT as a content generation tool in continuing medical education: acne as a test topic.Dermatology reports · 2025Article
- Assessing ChatGPT's Capability as a New Age Standardized Patient: Qualitative Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- The Role of ChatGPT in Personal Statements for Plastic Surgery Residency Applications: Program Directors' Perspective.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Review
- Perceptions and Earliest Experiences of Medical Students and Faculty With ChatGPT in Medical Education: Qualitative Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence chatbot, has rapidly gained prominence in various domains, including medical education and healthcare literature. This hybrid narrative review, conducted collaboratively by human authors and ChatGPT, aims to summarize and synthesize the current knowledge of ChatGPT in the indexed medical literature during its initial four months. A search strategy was employed in PubMed and EuropePMC databases, yielding 65 and 110 papers, respectively. These papers focused on ChatGPT's impact on medical education, scientific research, medical writing, ethical considerations, diagnostic decision-making, automation potential, and criticisms. The findings indicate a growing body of literature on ChatGPT's applications and implications in healthcare, highlighting the need for further research to assess its effectiveness and ethical concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.