Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37038177›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2023

Genome-wide association reveals host-specific genomic traits in Escherichia coli.

Sumeet K Tiwari, Boas C L van der Putten, Thilo M Fuchs, Trung N Vinh, Martin Bootsma, Rik Oldenkamp, Roberto La Ragione, Sebastien Matamoros, Ngo T Hoa, Christian Berens and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Visual Screening of Genetic Polymorphisms inSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. EnterohemorrhagicMicrobiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 13 institutions in 5 countries.

Sumeet K Tiwari *Robert Koch Institute, Genome Sequencing and Genomic Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3615-447X
Boas C L van der Putten *Department of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Thilo M FuchsFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Jena, Germany.
Trung N VinhOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Martin BootsmaUMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Rik OldenkampDepartment of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Roberto La RagioneDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Sebastien MatamorosDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ngo T HoaOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Christian BerensFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Jena, Germany.
Joy LengDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Julio ÁlvarezVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Ferrandis-VilaFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Jena, Germany.
Jenny M RitchieDepartment of Microbial Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Angelika FruthRobert Koch Institute, Enteropathogenic Bacteria and Legionella, Wernigerode, Germany.
Stefan SchwarzInstitute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Lucas DomínguezTropical medicine and global health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK.
María Ugarte-RuizVISAVET Health Surveillance Centre, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Astrid BetheInstitute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charlotte HuberInstitute of Microbiology and Epizootics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Vanessa JohannsRobert Koch Institute, Advanced Light and Electron Microscopy, Berlin, Germany.
Ivonne StammVet Med Labor GmbH, Division of IDEXX Laboratories, Kornwestheim, Germany.
Lothar H WielerRobert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Christa EwersInstitute of Hygiene and Infectious Diseases of Animals, Giessen, Germany.
Amanda Fivian-HughesDepartment of Microbial Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Herbert SchmidtInstitute of Food Science and Biotechnology, Department of Food Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Christian MengeFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Institute of Molecular Pathogenesis, Jena, Germany.
Torsten SemmlerRobert Koch Institute, Genome Sequencing and Genomic Epidemiology, Berlin, Germany. semmlert@rki.de.
Constance SchultszDepartment of Global Health, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. c.schultsz@aighd.org.
Robert Koch Institute · DEFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEUniversity of Surrey · GBAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development · NLFreie Universität Berlin · DEPham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine · VNUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLCan Tho University · VNIDEXX Laboratories (Germany) · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Hohenheim · DE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R002762/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEscherichia coli is an opportunistic pathogen which colonizes various host species. However, to what extent genetic lineages of E. coli are adapted or restricted to specific hosts and the genomic determinants of such adaptation or restriction is poorly understood.

resultsWe randomly sampled E. coli isolates from four countries (Germany, UK, Spain, and Vietnam), obtained from five host species (human, pig, cattle, chicken, and wild boar) over 16 years, from both healthy and diseased hosts, to construct a collection of 1198 whole-genome sequenced E. coli isolates. We identified associations between specific E. coli lineages and the host from which they were isolated. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified several E. coli genes that were associated with human, cattle, or chicken hosts, whereas no genes associated with the pig host could be found. In silico characterization of nine contiguous genes (collectively designated as nan-9) associated with the human host indicated that these genes are involved in the metabolism of sialic acids (Sia). In contrast, the previously described sialic acid regulon known as sialoregulon (i.e. nanRATEK-yhcH, nanXY, and nanCMS) was not associated with any host species. In vitro growth experiments with a Δnan-9 E. coli mutant strain, using the sialic acids 5-N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac) and N-glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) as sole carbon source, showed impaired growth behaviour compared to the wild-type.

conclusionsThis study provides an extensive analysis of genetic determinants which may contribute to host specificity in E. coli. Our findings should inform risk analysis and epidemiological monitoring of (antimicrobial resistant) E. coli.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsAnimalsCattleGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansSialic AcidsSwineSialic AcidsEscherichia coliGWASHost-specificitySialic acid

Identifiers

PMID37038177
PMCPMC10088187
OpenAlexW4363625441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.