Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37038126›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2023

Impact of externally facilitated continuous quality improvement cohorts on Advanced Access to support primary healthcare teams: protocol for a quasi-randomized cluster trial.

Mylaine Breton, Isabelle Gaboury, Elisabeth Martin, Michael E Green, Tara Kiran, Maude Laberge, Janusz Kaczorowski, Noah Ivers, Nadia Deville-Stoetzel, Francois Bordeleau and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05715151 (Impact of Externally Facilitated Continuous Quality Improvement Cohorts on Advanced Access to Support Primary Healthcare Teams), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05715151 naunknown statusnot on this map

Impact of Externally Facilitated Continuous Quality Improvement Cohorts on Advanced Access to Support Primary Healthcare Teams

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité de SherbrookeRan2022 to 2025Enrolled48ConditionsPrimary Health CareArmsCQI intervention, Audit and Feedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mylaine BretonUniversité de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada. mylaine.breton@usherbrooke.ca.
Isabelle GabouryUniversité de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Elisabeth MartinUniversité de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Michael E GreenQueen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Tara KiranUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Maude LabergeUniversité Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Janusz KaczorowskiUniversité de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Noah IversUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nadia Deville-StoetzelUniversité de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Francois BordeleauUniversité de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Christine BeaulieuUniversité de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Sarah DescoteauxUniversité de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-LeMoyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 477640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving access to primary health care is among top priorities for many countries. Advanced Access (AA) is one of the most recommended models to improve timely access to care. Over the past 15 years, the AA model has been implemented in Canada, but the implementation of AA varies substantially among providers and clinics. Continuous quality improvement (CQI) approaches can be used to promote organizational change like AA implementation. While CQI fosters the adoption of evidence-based practices, knowledge gaps remain, about the mechanisms by which QI happens and the sustainability of the results. The general aim of the study is to analyse the implementation and effects of CQI cohorts on AA for primary care clinics. Specific objectives are: 1) Analyse the process of implementing CQI cohorts to support PHC clinics in their improvement of AA. 2) Document and compare structural organisational changes and processes of care with respect to AA within study groups (intervention and control). 3) Assess the effectiveness of CQI cohorts on AA outcomes. 4) Appreciate the sustainability of the intervention for AA processes, organisational changes and outcomes.

methodsCluster-controlled trial allowing for a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation of the proposed intervention 48 multidisciplinary primary care clinics will be recruited to participate. 24 Clinics from the intervention regions will receive the CQI intervention for 18 months including three activities carried out iteratively until the clinic's improvement objectives are achieved: 1) reflective sessions and problem priorisation; 2) plan-do-study-act cycles; and 3) group mentoring. Clinics located in the control regions will receive an audit-feedback report on access. Complementary qualitative and quantitative data reflecting the quintuple aim will be collected over a period of 36 months.

resultsThis research will contribute to filling the gap in the generalizability of CQI interventions and accelerate the spread of effective AA improvement strategies while strengthening local QI culture within clinics. This research will have a direct impact on patients' experiences of care.

conclusionThis mixed-method approach offers a unique opportunity to contribute to the scientific literature on large-scale CQI cohorts to improve AA in primary care teams and to better understand the processes of CQI.

trial registrationClinical Trials: NCT05715151.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareQuality ImprovementCanadaCluster AnalysisHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdvanced AccessAudit and feedbackContinuous quality improvementInterprofessional carePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID37038126
PMCPMC10088119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.