Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37037992›Full record

Observational studyNeurocritical care2023

Diagnostic Value of the Combination of Ultrasonographic Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter and Width of Crural Cistern with Respect to the Intracranial Pressure in Patients Treated with Decompressive Craniotomy.

Xiaolan Xu, Yajing Lu, Jiqiao Liu, Renfan Xu, Kai Zhao, Anyu Tao

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intraindividual Optic Nerve Sheath Variation and Intracranial Pressure Changes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaolan XuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Yajing LuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Jiqiao LiuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Renfan XuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Kai ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Anyu TaoDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China. taoanyuabc@163.com.
Tongji Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) and detection of increased ICP are crucial because such increases may cause secondary brain injury and a poor prognosis. Although numerous ultrasound parameters, including optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), width of the crural cistern (WCC), and the flow velocities of the central retinal artery and middle cerebral artery, can be measured in patients after hemicraniectomy, researchers have yet to determine which of these is better for evaluating ICP. This study aimed to analyze the correlation between ICP and ultrasound parameters and investigate the best noninvasive estimator of ICP.

methodsThis observational study enrolled 50 patients with brain injury after hemicraniectomy from January 2021 to December 2021. All patients underwent invasive ICP monitoring with microsensor, transcranial, and ocular ultrasound postoperatively. We measured the ONSD including the dura mater (ONSDI), the ONSD excluding the dura mater, the optic nerve diameter (OND), the eyeball transverse diameter (ETD), the WCC, and the flow velocities in the central retinal artery and middle cerebral artery. Then, we calculated the ONSDI-OND (the difference between ONSDI and OND) and ONSDI/ETD (the ratio of ONSDI to ETD). Patients were divided into a normal ICP group (n = 35) and an increased ICP group (≥ 20 mm Hg, n = 15) according to the ICP measurements. Correlations were then assessed between the values of the ultrasound parameters and ICP.

resultsThe ONSDI, ONSDI-OND, and ONSDI/ETD were positively associated with ICP (r = 0.455, 0.482, 0.423 and p = 0.001, < 0.001, 0.002, respectively), whereas the WCC was negatively associated with ICP (r = - 0.586, p < 0.001). The WCC showed the highest predictive power for increased ICP (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.904), whereas the ONSDI-OND and ONSDI also presented with acceptable predictive power among the ONSD-related parameters (AUC = 0.831, 0.803, respectively). The cutoff values for increased ICP prediction for ONSDI, ONSDI-OND, and WCC were 6.29, 3.03, and 3.68 mm, respectively. The AUC of the combination of ONSDI-OND and WCC was 0.952 (95% confidence interval 0.896-1.0, p < 0.001).

conclusionsThe ONSDI, ONSDI-OND, and WCC were correlated with ICP and had acceptable accuracy levels in estimating ICP in patients after hemicraniectomy. Furthermore, WCC showed a higher diagnostic value than ONSD-related parameters, and the combination of ONSDI-OND and WCC was a satisfactory predictor of increased ICP.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesDecompressive CraniectomyIntracranial HypertensionHumansIntracranial PressureOptic NerveUltrasonographyIntracranial pressureOptic nerve sheath diameterUltrasonographyWidth of crural cistern

Identifiers

PMID37037992
OpenAlexW4363676678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.