Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37037975›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023

Current Management Options for Dyspnea in Cancer Patients.

Masanori Mori, Satoru Miwa, Tomoo Ikari, Jun Kako, Takaaki Hasegawa, Ryo Matsunuma, Kozue Suzuki, Yoshinobu Matsuda, Hiroaki Watanabe, Tatsuya Morita and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Randomized Controlled Trial of a Nurse-Led Brief Behavioral Intervention for Dyspnea in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Corticosteroids in lung cancer.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Masanori MoriDivision of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, 3453 Mikatahara-cho, Kita-ku, Hamamatsu, 433-8558, Japan. masanori.mori@sis.seirei.or.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-5489-9395
Satoru MiwaSeirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Tomoo IkariDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Jun KakoCollege of Nursing Art and Science, University of Hyogo, Akashi, Japan.
Takaaki HasegawaCenter for Psycho-oncology and Palliative Care, Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Ryo MatsunumaDivision of Palliative Care, Konan Medical Center, Konan, Japan.
Kozue SuzukiDepartment of Palliative Care, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshinobu MatsudaDepartment of Psychosomatic Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Sakai, Japan.
Hiroaki WatanabeHome Palliative Care Asunaro Clinic, Komaki, Japan.
Tatsuya MoritaDivision of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, 3453 Mikatahara-cho, Kita-ku, Hamamatsu, 433-8558, Japan.
Takashi YamaguchiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Seirei Mikatabara General Hospital · JPHokkaido University · JPKobe University · JPNagoya City University Hospital · JPNHO Kinki Chuo Chest Medical Center · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JPUniversity of Hyogo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementDyspnea is one of the most frequent and distressing symptoms in patients with advanced cancer. As dyspnea deteriorates patients' quality of life markedly and tends to worsen as the disease progresses, comprehensive assessment and timely treatment of the underlying etiologies are essential. International guidelines recommend various non-pharmacological and pharmacological management options. However, there is a scarcity of confirmatory clinical trials on cancer dyspnea, and the overall level of evidence is weak. Recently, observational and survey studies indicated a wide range of practice patterns of palliative care specialists, providing important insight into the real-world management of dyspnea. In this paper, we summarize current management options for dyspnea in cancer patients, highlight major controversies in the literature, and propose future research directions toward quality care for patients with dyspnea and their families.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeDyspneaHumansPalliative CareCareDyspneaEtiologyPharmacological management

Identifiers

PMID37037975
OpenAlexW4363679151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.