Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37037897›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

New non-ureolytic heterotrophic microbial induced carbonate precipitation for suppression of sand dune wind erosion.

Mohammad Hemayati, Ehsan Nikooee, Ghassem Habibagahi, Ali Niazi, Sayed Fakhreddin Afzali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Lead contamination fixation through COScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad HemayatiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Shiraz University, Zand Street, Shiraz, 71348-51156, Iran.
Ehsan NikooeeDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Shiraz University, Zand Street, Shiraz, 71348-51156, Iran. enikooee@shirazu.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-1132
Ghassem HabibagahiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Shiraz University, Zand Street, Shiraz, 71348-51156, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9715-6639
Ali NiaziInstitute of Biotechnology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9902-9422
Sayed Fakhreddin AfzaliDepartment of Natural Resource and Environmental Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6365-7382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detrimental effects of sand storms on agriculture, human health, transportation network, and infrastructures pose serious threats in many countries worldwide. Hence, wind erosion is considered a global challenge. An environmental-friendly method to suppress wind erosion is to employ microbially induced carbonate precipitation (MICP). However, the by-products of ureolysis-based MICP, such as ammonia, are not favorable when produced in large volumes. This study introduces two calcium formate-bacteria compositions for non-ureolytic MICP and comprehensively compares their performance with two calcium acetate-bacteria compositions, all of which do not produce ammonia. The considered bacteria are Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. First, the optimized values of factors controlling CaCO

Indexed as

Calcium CarbonateSandAmmoniaBacillus subtilisCarbonatesChemical PrecipitationFormatesHumansAmmoniaCalcium CarbonateCarbonatesFormatesformic acidSand

Identifiers

PMID37037897
PMCPMC10086056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.