Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37037885›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Comparative study on landslide susceptibility mapping based on unbalanced sample ratio.

Li Tang, Xianyu Yu, Weiwei Jiang, Jianguo Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Li TangSchool of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.
Xianyu YuSchool of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China. yuxianyu@hbut.edu.cn.
Weiwei JiangSchool of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.
Jianguo ZhouSchool of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, People's Republic of China.
Hubei University of Technology · CNHubei University · CN

Funding

Innovation Demonstration Base of Ecological Environment Geotechnical and Ecological Restoration of Rivers and Lakes 2020EJB004the National Natural Science Foundation of China 41807297the National Natural Science Foundation of China 42101375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Zigui-Badong section of the Three Gorges Reservoir area is used as the research area in this study to research the impact of unbalanced sample sets on Landslide Susceptibility Mapping (LSM) and determine the sample ratio interval with the best performance for different models. We employ 12 LSM factors, five training sample sets with different sample ratios (1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16), and C5.0, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), and one-dimensional Convolution Neural Network (CNN) models are used to obtain landslide susceptibility index and landslide susceptibility zoning in the study area, respectively. The prediction performance of the model is evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve value, five statistical methods, and specific category precision. The results show that the CNN, SVM, and LR models in the sample ratio of 1:2 achieve better performance than on the balanced sample set, which indicates the importance of the unbalanced sample set in training the LSM modeling. The C5.0 model is always in a state of overfitting in this study and needs to be further studied. The conclusions put forward in this study help improve the scientificity and reliability of LSM.

Identifiers

PMID37037885
PMCPMC10086050
OpenAlexW4363675695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.