Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37037855›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Comparative analysis of bacterial diversity in two hot springs in Hefei, China.

Feng-Qin Zhang, Jun Liu, Xiao-Ju Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Feng-Qin ZhangCollege of Chemistry and Material Engineering, Chaohu University, Chaohu, 238024, Anhui, China.
Jun LiuCollege of Biology and Food Engineering, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu, 241000, Anhui, China.
Xiao-Ju ChenCollege of Chemistry and Material Engineering, Chaohu University, Chaohu, 238024, Anhui, China. 053042@chu.edu.cn.
Chaohu University · CNAnhui Polytechnic University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hot springs are extreme ecological environments of microbes. The study is the first comparative analysis of bacterial diversity of Tangchi and Bantang hot spring water samples collected in Hefei, China, which is conducive to the further development and utilization of microbial resources in hot springs. Illumina MiSeq system was utilized to sequence and analyze the bacterial 16S rRNA gene from hot spring water samples by bioinformatics, to probe into the bacterial abundance and diversity of two hot springs in Hefei. Results revealed that prevalent bacterial phyla in Tangchi hot spring were Bacillota and Aquificota, and the prevalent bacterial genus was Hydrogenobacter; prevalent phyla in Bantang hot spring were Pseudomonadota followed by Actinobacteriota, and prevalent genera were CL500-29_marine_group and Polynucleobacter. More species and higher evenness in Bantang hot spring than those in Tangchi hot spring. In MetaCyc pathway analysis, the major pathways of metabolism existed in the bacteria from the two hot springs were 'pyruvate fermentation to isobutanol (engineered)', 'acetylene degradation', 'carbon fixation pathways in prokaryotes', 'nitrate reduction I (denitrification)', 'methanogenesis from acetate', 'superpathway of glucose and xylose degradation', etc.

Indexed as

Hot SpringsBacteriaBiodiversityChinaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID37037855
PMCPMC10086057
OpenAlexW4363676483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.