Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37037851›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

New insights into how popular electronic cigarette aerosols and aerosol constituents affect SARS-CoV-2 infection of human bronchial epithelial cells.

Rattapol Phandthong, Man Wong, Ann Song, Teresa Martinez, Prue Talbot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The triple-hit hypothesis: exploring pulmonary e-cigarette, PMEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Does vaping increase the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection? Paradoxically yes and no.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rattapol PhandthongDepartment of Molecular, Cell and System Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Man WongDepartment of Molecular, Cell and System Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Ann SongDepartment of Molecular, Cell and System Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Teresa MartinezDepartment of Molecular, Cell and System Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Prue TalbotDepartment of Molecular, Cell and System Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA. talbot@ucr.edu.
University of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Identification and toxicity of chemicals that are linked to EVALIR01ES029741 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI TALBOT, PRUDENCE · 2018 to 2022
$3.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES029741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between the use of tobacco products and SARS-CoV-2 infection is poorly understood and controversial. Few studies have examined the effect of electronic cigarettes (ECs) on SARS-CoV-2 infection. We tested the hypothesis that EC fluids and aerosols with nicotine promote SARS-COV-2 infection by increasing viral entry into human respiratory epithelial cells. Responses of BEAS-2B cells to JUUL aerosols or their individual constituents were compared using three exposure platforms: submerged culture, air-liquid-interface (ALI) exposure in a cloud chamber, and ALI exposure in a Cultex system, which produces authentic heated EC aerosols. In general, nicotine and nicotine + propylene glycol/vegetable glycerin aerosols increased ACE2 (angiotensin converting enzyme 2) levels, the SARS-CoV-2 receptor; and increased the activity of TMPRSS2 (transmembrane serine protease 2), an enzyme essential for viral entry. Lentivirus pseudoparticles with spike protein were used to test viral penetration. Exposure to nicotine, EC fluids, or aerosols altered the infection machinery and increased viral entry into cells. While most data were in good agreement across the three exposure platforms, cells were more responsive to treatments when exposed at the ALI in the Cultex system, even though the exposures were brief and intermittent. While both nicotine and JUUL aerosols increased SARS-CoV-2 infection, JUUL significantly decreased the effect of nicotine alone. These data support the idea that vaping can increase the likelihood of contracting COVID-19 and that e-liquid composition may modulate this effect.

Indexed as

COVID-19Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsEpithelial CellsHumansNicotineRespiratory Aerosols and DropletsSARS-CoV-2Nicotine

Identifiers

PMID37037851
PMCPMC10086046
OpenAlexW4363675097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.