Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37037850›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Brazilian Amazon indigenous territories under deforestation pressure.

Celso H L Silva-Junior, Fabrício B Silva, Barbara Maisonnave Arisi, Guilherme Mataveli, Ana C M Pessôa, Nathália S Carvalho, João B C Reis, Admo R Silva Júnior, Nathalia A C S Motta, Paulo Vinícius Moreira E Silva and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Childhood vaccination coverage and socioeconomic inequalities in the Northern region of Brazil.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Road expansion risk predicts future hotspots of tropical deforestation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Indigenous territories and protected areas are crucial for ecosystem connectivity in the Amazon basin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Amazonian conservation across archipelagos of Indigenous territories.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A large net carbon loss attributed to anthropogenic and natural disturbances in the Amazon Arc of Deforestation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Malaria in areas under mining activity in the Amazon: A review.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Celso H L Silva-Junior *Institute of Environment and Sustainability, University of California Los Angeles - UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. celsohlsj@gmail.com.
Fabrício B SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Meio Ambiente, Universidade Ceuma - UNICEUMA, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Barbara Maisonnave ArisiVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Guilherme MataveliNational Institute for Space Research - INPE, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Ana C M PessôaNational Center for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disasters - Cemaden, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Nathália S CarvalhoInstituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia - IPAM, Brasília, Brazil.
João B C ReisNational Center for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disasters - Cemaden, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Admo R Silva JúniorPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação, Universidade Federal do Maranhão - UFMA, São Luís, Brazil.
Nathalia A C S MottaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Meio Ambiente, Universidade Ceuma - UNICEUMA, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Paulo Vinícius Moreira E SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Meio Ambiente, Universidade Ceuma - UNICEUMA, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Francarlos Diniz RibeiroPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Meio Ambiente, Universidade Ceuma - UNICEUMA, São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Juliana Siqueira-GayInstituto Escolhas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ane AlencarInstituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia - IPAM, Brasília, Brazil.
Sassan SaatchiInstitute of Environment and Sustainability, University of California Los Angeles - UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Luiz E O C AragãoNational Institute for Space Research - INPE, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Liana O AndersonNational Center for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disasters - Cemaden, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Maycon Melo *Programa de Pós-Graduação em Meio Ambiente, Universidade Ceuma - UNICEUMA, São Luís, MA, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies showed that Brazilian Amazon indigenous territories (ITs) are efficient models for preserving forests by reducing deforestation, fires, and related carbon emissions. Considering the importance of ITs for conserving socio-environmental and cultural diversity and the recent climb in the Brazilian Amazon deforestation, we used official remote sensing datasets to analyze deforestation inside and outside indigenous territories within Brazil's Amazon biome during the 2013-2021 period. Deforestation has increased by 129% inside ITs since 2013, followed by an increase in illegal mining areas. In 2019-2021, deforestation was 195% higher and 30% farther from the borders towards the interior of indigenous territories than in previous years (2013-2018). Furthermore, about 59% of carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesForestsBrazilClimateEcosystem

Identifiers

PMID37037850
PMCPMC10085996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.