ArticleJournal of molecular cell biology2023
Accurate prediction of pan-cancer types using machine learning with minimal number of DNA methylation sites.
Article in Journal of molecular cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating artificial intelligence into cancers of unknown primary diagnosis and treatment.iScience · 2026Review
- Early detection of multiple cancers: the era of methylation-based liquid biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Pan-cancer analysis shapes the understanding of cancer biology and medicine.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2025Review
- Accurate identification of primary site in tumors of unknown origin (TUO) using DNA methylation.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Role of AI in empowering and redefining the oncology care landscape: perspective from a developing nation.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- PathMethy: an interpretable AI framework for cancer origin tracing based on DNA methylation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methylation analysis has been applied to determine the primary site of cancer; however, robust and accurate prediction of cancer types with a minimum number of sites is still a significant scientific challenge. To build an accurate and robust cancer type prediction tool with a minimum number of DNA methylation sites, we internally benchmarked different DNA methylation site selection and ranking procedures, as well as different classification models. We used The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset (26 cancer types with 8296 samples) to train and test models and used an independent dataset (17 cancer types with 2738 samples) for model validation. A deep neural network model using a combined feature selection procedure (named MethyDeep) can predict 26 cancer types using 30 methylation sites with superior performance compared with the known methods for both primary and metastatic cancers in independent validation datasets. In conclusion, MethyDeep is an accurate and robust cancer type predictor with the minimum number of DNA methylation sites; it could help the cost-effective clarification of cancer of unknown primary patients and the liquid biopsy-based early screening of cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.