Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37037511›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2023

Prognostic effect of cachexia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Norikazu Matsuo, Koichi Azuma, Kenta Murotani, Daiki Murata, Goushi Matama, Akihiko Kawahara, Takashi Kojima, Takaaki Tokito, Tomoaki Hoshino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The role of pharmacists in multimodal cancer cachexia care.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Norikazu MatsuoDivision of Respirology, Neurology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Koichi AzumaDivision of Respirology, Neurology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5040-5856
Kenta MurotaniBiostatistics Center, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
Daiki MurataDivision of Respirology, Neurology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Goushi MatamaDivision of Respirology, Neurology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Akihiko KawaharaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takashi KojimaDivision of Respirology, Neurology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takaaki TokitoDivision of Respirology, Neurology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tomoaki HoshinoDivision of Respirology, Neurology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kurume University · JPKurume University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe presence of cachexia in cancer patients negatively affects the quality of life and survival. However, the impact of cachexia on immunotherapy, such as PD-1/L1 inhibitors, is not fully understood. Therefore, we examined whether cancer cachexia affects the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

methodsWe retrospectively screened patients with pathologically confirmed advanced or recurrent NSCLC who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy at Kurume University Hospital. We defined cancer cachexia as weight loss of at least 5% during the past 6 months or any degree of weight loss more than 2% and BMI <20.

resultsAmong 182 patients, 74 had cancer cachexia. The presence of cachexia was significantly associated with females, poor performance status (PS), never-smokers, and driver mutations. Multivariate analysis revealed that poor PS and being a smoker were associated with the presence of cachexia. Patients with cancer cachexia had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In the multivariate analysis, PS and sex were significantly correlated with PFS, whereas PS and cachexia were significantly correlated with OS. Subanalysis revealed that patients in the PS0/without cachexia group had longer PFS and OS than those in the cachexia or PS1-3 group.

conclusionsIn NSCLC patients, cachexia was associated with a worse prognosis, irrespective of tumor PD-L1 expression, indicating that cachexia is a predictive factor for NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenCachexiaFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesB7-H1 AntigenImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorcachexiaNSCLCPD-1 inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID37037511
PMCPMC10212657
OpenAlexW4363625495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.