Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37037437›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2023

Validity of Self-Reported Mosquito Bites to Assess Household Mosquito Abundance in Six Communities of Esmeraldas Province, Ecuador.

Brian Glover, Gwenyth O Lee, Oscar Suing, Thien-An Ha, Panpim Thongsripong, Varsovia Cevallos, Patricio Ponce, Hannah Van Wyk, Amy C Morrison, Josefina Coloma and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian GloverDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Gwenyth O LeeRutgers Global Health Institute, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Oscar SuingCentro de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Vectoriales, Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública, Quito, Ecuador.
Thien-An HaDivision of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Panpim ThongsripongFlorida Medical Entomology Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Nematology, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Vero Beach, Florida.
Varsovia CevallosCentro de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Vectoriales, Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública, Quito, Ecuador.
Patricio PonceCentro de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas y Vectoriales, Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública, Quito, Ecuador.
Hannah Van WykDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Amy C MorrisonDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, California.
Josefina ColomaDivision of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Joseph N S EisenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública · ECUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

American Asian Centers for Arbovirus Research and Enhanced Surveillance (A2CARES)U01AI151788 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Josefina Coloma, Eva Harris · 2020 to 2026
$9.6M
Zika and Dengue Co-circulation Under Environmental Change and UrbanizationR01AI132372 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COLOMA, JOSEFINA, EISENBERG, JOSEPH N. S. · 2017 to 2020
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI132372NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI151788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquito-borne diseases are a global burden; however, current methods of evaluating human-mosquito contact rates are expensive and time consuming. Validated surveys of self-reported mosquito bites may be an inexpensive way to determine mosquito presence and bite exposure level in an area, but this remains untested. In this study, a survey of self-reported mosquito bites was validated against household mosquito abundance from six communities in Esmeraldas, Ecuador. From February 2021 to July 2022, households were interviewed monthly, and five questions were used to ask participants how often they were bitten by mosquitoes at different times during the day. At the same time, adult mosquitoes were collected using a Prokopack aspirator. Species were identified and counted. Survey responses were compared with the total number of mosquitoes found in the home using negative binomial regression. More frequent self-reported mosquito bites were significantly associated with higher numbers of collected adult mosquitoes. These associations were driven by the prevalence of the dominant genera, Culex. These results suggest that surveys of perceived mosquito bites relate to actual mosquito presence, making them a potentially useful tool for determining the impact of vector-control interventions on community perceptions of risk but less useful for assessing the risk of nondominant species such as Aedes aegypti. Further work is needed to examine the robustness of these results in other contexts.

Indexed as

AedesInsect Bites and StingsAdultAnimalsEcuadorFamily CharacteristicsHumansMosquito VectorsSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID37037437
PMCPMC10160883
OpenAlexW4363650336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.