Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37036988›Full record

SynthesisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Tracking the global application of conservation translocation and social attraction to reverse seabird declines.

Dena R Spatz, Lindsay C Young, Nick D Holmes, Holly P Jones, Eric A VanderWerf, Donald E Lyons, Stephen Kress, Colin M Miskelly, Graeme A Taylor

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Tracking the global application of conservation translocation and social attraction to reverse seabird declines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Assessing responses of reef island seabirds to environmental and anthropogenic drivers.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Interspecies conflict, precarious reasoning, and the gull problem in the Gulf of Maine.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Anthropogenic impacts at the interface of animal spatial and social behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dena R SpatzPacific Rim Conservation, Honolulu, HI 96839.ORCID 0000-0001-9784-0652
Lindsay C YoungPacific Rim Conservation, Honolulu, HI 96839.ORCID 0000-0003-1646-6676
Nick D HolmesThe Nature Conservancy, Santa Cruz, CA 95060.
Holly P JonesDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115.ORCID 0000-0002-5512-9958
Eric A VanderWerfPacific Rim Conservation, Honolulu, HI 96839.ORCID 0000-0003-3767-1767
Donald E LyonsNational Audubon Society, Seabird Institute, Bremen, ME 04551.ORCID 0000-0003-4486-9261
Stephen KressNational Audubon Society, Seabird Institute, Bremen, ME 04551.ORCID 0000-0002-0052-4889
Colin M MiskellyMuseum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, Wellington, NZ 6140.ORCID 0000-0001-8789-3208
Graeme A TaylorNew Zealand Department of Conservation, Wellington, NZ 6140.ORCID 0000-0001-9546-4980

Funding

David and Lucile Packard Foundation (PF) 2019-68989Nature Conservancy (TNC) 11192020-14624 - Sub-Agt-030521-14273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global loss of biodiversity has inspired actions to restore nature across the planet. Translocation and social attraction actions deliberately move or lure a target species to a restoration site to reintroduce or augment populations and enhance biodiversity and ecosystem resilience. Given limited conservation funding and rapidly accelerating extinction trajectories, tracking progress of these interventions can inform best practices and advance management outcomes. Seabirds are globally threatened and commonly targeted for translocation and social attraction ("active seabird restoration"), yet no framework exists for tracking these efforts nor informing best practices. This study addresses this gap for conservation decision makers responsible for seabirds and coastal management. We systematically reviewed active seabird restoration projects worldwide and collated results into a publicly accessible Seabird Restoration Database. We describe global restoration trends, apply a systematic process to measure success rates and response times since implementation, and examine global factors influencing outcomes. The database contains 851 active restoration events in 551 locations targeting 138 seabird species; 16% of events targeted globally threatened taxa. Visitation occurred in 80% of events and breeding occurred in 76%, on average 2 y after implementation began (SD = 3.2 y). Outcomes varied by taxonomy, with the highest and quickest breeding response rates for Charadriiformes (terns, gulls, and auks), primarily with social attraction. Given delayed and variable response times to active restoration, 5 y is appropriate before evaluating outcomes. The database and results serve as a model for tracking and evaluating restoration outcomes, and is applicable to measuring conservation interventions for additional threatened taxa.

Indexed as

CharadriiformesEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationAnimalsBreedingConservation of Natural ResourcesDatabases, FactualEcosystemExtinction, BiologicalInternationalitydata synthesisrestorationseabirdsocial attractiontranslocation

Identifiers

PMID37036988
PMCPMC10120044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.