Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37036959›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2023

Clinical impact of cryopreservation of allogeneic hematopoietic cell grafts during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Steven M Devine, Stephanie Bo-Subait, Michelle Kuxhausen, Stephen R Spellman, Caitrin Bupp, Kwang Woo Ahn, Heather E Stefanski, Jeffery J Auletta, Brent R Logan, Bronwen E Shaw

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven M DevineCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-7731-759X
Stephanie Bo-SubaitCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, MN.
Michelle KuxhausenCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, MN.
Stephen R SpellmanCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, MN.
Caitrin BuppCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, MN.
Kwang Woo AhnDepartment of Medicine, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.ORCID 0000-0003-4567-8037
Heather E StefanskiCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, MN.
Jeffery J AulettaCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, National Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, MN.
Brent R LoganDepartment of Medicine, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
Bronwen E ShawDepartment of Medicine, Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
National Marrow Donor Program · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Marrow Donor Program mandated the cryopreservation of hematopoietic cell grafts from volunteer unrelated donors because of numerous patient and donor safety concerns and logistical hurdles. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research outcomes database, we report the impact of cryopreservation on overall survival (OS) and other outcomes within 1 year after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We analyzed 1543 recipients of cryopreserved allografts receiving HCT at US centers during the first 6 months of the pandemic and compared them with 2499 recipients of fresh allografts during a 6-month period in 2019. On multivariable regression analysis, we observed no difference in the OS (P = .09), nonrelapse mortality (P = .89), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), or GVHD- and relapse-free survival (P = .58) in recipients of cryopreserved vs fresh allografts. Disease-free survival (DFS) was lower in the cryopreserved allograft recipients (P = .006) because of a higher risk of relapse (P = .01) compared with the fresh allograft recipients. Primary graft failure was higher (P = .01), and the risk of chronic GVHD was lower (P = .001) with cryopreservation compared with fresh grafts. In conclusion, although there was no negative impact of cryopreservation on OS, relapse was higher, and DFS was lower than that with no cryopreservation. Fresh grafts are recommended as the pandemic-related logistical hurdles resolve. Cryopreservation should be considered an option for patients when fresh grafts are not feasible.

Indexed as

COVID-19Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationCryopreservationHumansPandemicsRecurrenceUnrelated Donors

Identifiers

PMID37036959
PMCPMC10580174
OpenAlexW4363674240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.