Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37036865›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2023

Efficacy of T-Cell Receptor-Based Adoptive Cell Therapy in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Ramon Yarza, Mateo Bover, Mercedes Herrera-Juarez, Macarena Rey-Cardenas, Luis Paz-Ares, Jose A Lopez-Martin, John Haanen

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Afatinib exerts an inhibitory effect on T cell-mediated cytotoxicity.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Metabolism of tumor infiltrating T cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Engineered T Cell Receptor for Cancer Immunotherapy.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ramon YarzaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5885-0820
Mateo BoverDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes Herrera-JuarezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Macarena Rey-CardenasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Paz-AresDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Jose A Lopez-MartinVirology and Inflammation Unit, PharmaMar, SA, Madrid, Spain.
John HaanenDivision of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESPharmaMar (Spain) · ESThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundT-cell receptor (TCR-T) therapies are based on the expression of an introduced TCR targeting a tumor associated antigen (TAA) which has been studied in several trials in cutaneous melanoma. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to assess the primary efficacy of TCR-based adoptive cell therapy in cutaneous melanoma.

methodsWe searched through PubMed electronic database from its inception until May 21, 2022. Primary endpoints were pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). We conducted logistic regression analyses to identify potential predictive factors for tumor response.

resultsFrom 187 patients, 50 showed an objective response (pooled ORR 28%; 95% CI, 20%-37%) and a pooled DCR of 38% (95% CI, 27%-50%). Median PFS was 2, 9 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.1). A trend toward higher PFS was demonstrated for patients treated with cancer/testis antigens targeting TCR-T cells (HR 0.91 95% CI, 0.64-1.3, P = .61) among whom, patients treated with NYESO-1 targeting TCR-T showed a significantly higher PFS (HR 0.63 95% CI, 0.64-0.98, P = .03). In addition, the number of infused cells was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of tumor response (OR 6.61; 95% CI, 1.68-21.6; P = .007).

conclusionTCR-T therapy shows promising results in terms of antitumor activity and survival similar to those reported for TILs with a significantly higher benefit for cancer/testis antigens targeting cells. Since TCR-based therapy shows advantages of great potential over classic ACT strategies, further research in solid cancers is warranted (PROSPERO ID CRD42022328011).

Indexed as

MelanomaSkin NeoplasmsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveMaleReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-Celladoptive cell therapycutaneous melanomameta-analysisT-cell receptor

Identifiers

PMID37036865
PMCPMC10243774
OpenAlexW4363624970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.