ArticleJAMA network open2023
Changes in the Frequency and Type of Barriers to Reproductive Health Care Between 2017 and 2021.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of adolescent contraceptive care in the pediatric emergency department: A pilot randomized controlled trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2024Trial
- It's about time: Racial/ethnic health disparities conditional on socioeconomic status among US women, 1978-2018.SSM - population health · 2026Article
- Development of a novel methyl cellulose hydrogel with physiologically relevant controlled ethanol release for cervical dysplasia ablation.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic and demographic differentials in unintended pregnancies, abortion, and contraceptive use in Spain: insights from the 2018 Fertility Survey.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Optimizing inpatient access to oral contraceptives: A quality improvement approach in behavioral health.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Telehealth for Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare: Evidence Map of Effectiveness, Patient and Provider Experiences and Preferences, and Patient Engagement Strategies.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- Time Pressures and Sociocultural Constraints Affecting Access to Early Abortion Care Under Texas' "6-Week" Ban.Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2026Article
- Reproductive health seeking behaviour and its determinants in Indian women-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- Contraceptive care and method use by sexual and gender minority status: insights from a longitudinal panel of sexual and reproductive healthcare patients in Wisconsin.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Contraceptive Barriers and Psychological Well-Being After Repeat Induced Abortion: A Systematic Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Retrospective Study Analyzing Sexually Transmitted Infections and Bacterial Vaginosis.Cureus · 2025Article
- The Association Between Sexual Victimization History and Consensual and Nonconsensual Rough Sex: Findings from a U.S. Nationally Representative Survey.Psychology of violence · 2025Article
- Application of machine learning algorithms and SHAP explanations to predict fertility preference among reproductive women in Somalia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Changes in contraceptive method use, access, and experiences of care during a statewide contraceptive initiative.Contraception · 2025Article
- Contraceptive use among transgender men and gender diverse individuals in the United States: Reasons for use, non-use, and methods used for pregnancy prevention.Contraception · 2025Article
- Empowering Women Through Knowledge: A Systematic Review of Literature on Menstrual and Reproductive Health Literacy.Health equity · 2025Review
- Understanding the Values, Qualities, and Preferences of Patients in Their Relationships With Obstetrics and Gynecology Providers: Cross-Sectional Survey With a Mixed Methods Approach.Journal of participatory medicine · 2024Article
- Mental Health Distress and Delayed Contraception Among Older Adolescents and Young Adults.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a community risk score for sexual and reproductive health in the United States.Health affairs scholar · 2024Article
- Has the fall ofHealth affairs scholar · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Previous research has documented individual-level barriers to reproductive health services, but few studies have examined national trends. Objective: To determine whether the number and type of barriers to reproductive health care experienced by US women of reproductive age changed from 2017 to 2021. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used serial survey data, weighted to be nationally representative, collected in August 2017 and December 2021 from members of Ipsos's KnowledgePanel who were aged 18 to 49 years and assigned female at birth. Exposures: Having experienced barriers to reproductive health care over the past 3 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was number and type of barriers to reproductive health care services, including Papanicolaou tests or birth control, experienced in the past 3 years. Increases in barriers to reproductive health care were measured using multivariable linear regressions adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, education level, employment status, metropolitan area, geographic region, household income, and language (English vs Spanish). Results: Of 29 496 KnowledgePanel members invited, 7022 (mean [SD] age, 33.9 [9.0] years) and 6841 (mean [SD] age, 34.2 [8.6] years) completed the 2017 and 2021 surveys (50% and 45% response rates, respectively). Among 12 351 participants who indicated that they had ever tried accessing reproductive health services, 35.9% (95% CI, 34.8%-37.0%) were aged 30 to 39 years; 5.5% (95% CI, 4.9%-6.2%) were Asian or Pacific Islander, 13.7% (95% CI, 12.8%-14.6%) were Black, 19.1% (95% CI, 18.1%-20.1%) were Hispanic, 58.2% (95% CI, 57.0%-59.5%) were White, and 3.5% (95% CI, 3.1%-4.0%) were multiracial or of other race or ethnicity; and 11.7% (95% CI, 11.0%-12.5%) were living below 100% of the federal poverty level. Covariate distribution was similar across years. In bivariable analyses, participants were more likely to report experiencing a given barrier in the past 3 years in 2021 than in 2017 for all but 2 barriers. More people experienced 3 or more barriers in 2021 (18.6%; 95% CI, 17.3%-20.0%) than in 2017 (16.1%; 95% CI, 14.9%-17.4%) (P = .008). In multivariable analyses, the mean number of barriers increased significantly from 1.09 (95% CI, 1.02-1.14) in 2017 to 1.29 (95% CI, 1.22-1.37) (P < .001) in 2021. Participants who were aged 25 to 29 years (0.42; 95% CI, 0.37-0.47), identified as Hispanic (0.41; 95% CI, 0.38-0.45), had no high school diploma or General Educational Development test (0.62; 95% CI, 0.53-0.72), lived below 100% of the federal poverty level (0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.73), and took the survey in Spanish (0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.01) saw the greatest increases in mean number of barriers between 2017 and 2021. Conclusions and Relevance: The study findings suggest that barriers to reproductive health care increased between 2017 and 2021, with the largest increases observed among individuals from historically disadvantaged populations. Efforts are needed to ensure that reproductive health care access remains a priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.