Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37036574›Full record

ReviewMagma (New York, N.Y.)2023

A vision of 14 T MR for fundamental and clinical science.

Steve Bates, Serge O Dumoulin, Paul J M Folkers, Elia Formisano, Rainer Goebel, Aidin Haghnejad, Rick C Helmich, Dennis Klomp, Anja G van der Kolk, Yi Li and 8 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. First In VivoMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Cerebellar imaging for neuroscience at 9.4 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Easy-to-useMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Steve BatesTesla Engineering Ltd., Water Lane, Storrington, West Sussex, RH20 3EA, UK.
Serge O DumoulinSpinoza Centre for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul J M FolkersPhilips, Best, The Netherlands.
Elia FormisanoDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rainer GoebelDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Aidin HaghnejadWavetronica, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rick C HelmichDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Dennis KlompRadiology Department, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anja G van der KolkDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Yi LiIndependent Researcher, Magdeburg, Germany.
Aart NederveenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David G NorrisDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. david.norris@donders.ru.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3699-6917
Natalia PetridouRadiology Department, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stefan RoellNeoscan Solutions GmbH, Joseph-von-Fraunhofer-Str. 6, 39106, Magdeburg, Germany.
Tom W J ScheenenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Menno M SchoonheimDepartment of Anatomy and Neurosciences, MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Location VUmc, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ingmar VoogtWavetronica, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Andrew WebbDepartment of Radiology, C.J. Gorter MRI Centre, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe outline our vision for a 14 Tesla MR system. This comprises a novel whole-body magnet design utilizing high temperature superconductor; a console and associated electronic equipment; an optimized radiofrequency coil setup for proton measurement in the brain, which also has a local shim capability; and a high-performance gradient set. RESEARCH FIELDS: The 14 Tesla system can be considered a 'mesocope': a device capable of measuring on biologically relevant scales. In neuroscience the increased spatial resolution will anatomically resolve all layers of the cortex, cerebellum, subcortical structures, and inner nuclei. Spectroscopic imaging will simultaneously measure excitatory and inhibitory activity, characterizing the excitation/inhibition balance of neural circuits. In medical research (including brain disorders) we will visualize fine-grained patterns of structural abnormalities and relate these changes to functional and molecular changes. The significantly increased spectral resolution will make it possible to detect (dynamic changes in) individual metabolites associated with pathological pathways including molecular interactions and dynamic disease processes.

conclusionsThe 14 Tesla system will offer new perspectives in neuroscience and fundamental research. We anticipate that this initiative will usher in a new era of ultra-high-field MR.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHeadRadio WavesBrain disordersMedical applicationsNeuroimagingNeuroscienceUltra-High Field MRI

Identifiers

PMID37036574
PMCPMC10088620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.