Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37036521›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2023

Investigation of intestinal parasites by conventional and molecular methods in children with gastrointestinal system complaints.

Merve Özkan-Ahmetoğlu, Filiz Demirel, Medine Ayşin Taşar, Bedia Dinç, Fakhriddin Sarzhanov, Funda Dogruman-Al

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular detection ofFood and waterborne parasitology · 2025
    Article
  3. Blastocystis hominis; Friend or Foe.Integrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Merve Özkan-AhmetoğluDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Health Science University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-426X
Filiz DemirelDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. dr.filiz.demirel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3513-8347
Medine Ayşin TaşarDepartment of Pediatrics, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Health Science University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4367-725X
Bedia DinçDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Health Science University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8318-2556
Fakhriddin SarzhanovFaculty of Medicine, Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkistan, Kazakhstan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9433-2126
Funda Dogruman-AlDivision of Medical Parasitology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9118-3935
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRAhmet Yesevi University · KZBilkent University · TRGazi University · TR

Funding

Scientific Research Unit of Gazi University (Ankara, Türkiye) 01/2020-41
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal parasitic infections are a global health problem that causes morbidity and mortality, especially in children living in rural areas. In this study, stool samples of pediatric patients with gastrointestinal complaints were examined by conventional and molecular methods to determine the prevalence of intestinal parasites. A total of 100 pediatric patients with gastrointestinal complaints and 50 healthy children were included in the study. Stool samples were collected from each child and examined by direct microscopic examination (native-Lugol method), formol-ethyl acetate concentration technique, Kinyoun's acid-fast staining, and Wheatley trichrome staining methods. Real-time PCR was used for the detection of Blastocystis spp. and D. fragilis in the stool samples. Sanger sequencing was used to identify Blastocystis spp. subtypes. One or more intestinal parasites were found in 12% (n = 100) of the patient group and 1% (n = 50) of the control group using conventional techniques. By using real-time PCR, Blastocystis spp. was discovered in 14% (14/100) of the patient group and 8% (4/50) of the control group. There was no significant difference in the frequency of Blastocystis spp. between the two groups. The most prevalent Blastocystis subtype was ST1 and the most frequent allele was a2 among the samples successfully amplified and sequenced. D. fragilis was detected in 17% (17/100) of the patient group and 8% (4/50) of the control group by real-time PCR. The prevalence of D. fragilis was not significantly different between the patient and control groups, as well. Blastocystis spp. and D. fragilis were found in high prevalence in pediatric patients with gastrointestinal complaints in this study. Although the role of these protists as a pathogen in humans is still controversial, it is supposed to the presence of the parasites are associated with gastrointestinal disorders such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. More case-control studies are needed to understand the pathogenic or commensal role of these parasites on the intestinal microbiota, especially in both patients with gastrointestinal disorders and healthy individuals.

Indexed as

BlastocystisBlastocystis InfectionsGastrointestinal DiseasesIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticParasitesAnimalsChildFecesHumansPrevalenceBlastocystis spp.ChildrenConventional and molecular diagnosisDientamoeba fragilisParasitic intestinal diseases

Identifiers

PMID37036521
OpenAlexW4363646633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.