ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2023
Novel sampling scheme with reduced cores in men with multiparametric MRI-visible lesions undergoing prostate biopsy.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Refining biopsy strategies stratified by PI-RADS score in men: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Nature communications · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic versus perilesional sampling in transperineal MRI-fusion biopsy: is perilesional sampling ready for prime time? A high-volume center analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Performance of MR fusion biopsy, systematic biopsy and combined biopsy on prostate cancer detection rate in 1229 patients stratified by PI-RADSv2 score on 3T multi-parametric MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of unilateral systematic biopsy combined with targeted biopsy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the effects of various prostate biopsy protocols with reduced cores on the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in individuals with MRI-visible lesions (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System ≥ 3).
methodsA total of 464 patients with MRI-visible lesions were recruited. All patients underwent two or more targeted biopsies (TB) and systematic biopsies (SB). Several hypothetical biopsy schemes were set-up: TB alone, TB+ipsilateral SB, TB+contralateral SB, TB+SB of the targeted sector (TB+t-SB), and TB+SB of the non-targeted sector (TB+n-SB). A subgroup analysis of patients with multiple MRI-visible lesions was performed. The standard of reference was defined as TB+SB. McNemar test was used to compare csPCa detection rates between various sampling schemes.
resultsThe detection rates for prostate cancer and csPCa were 72.8% (338 of 464) and 62.1% (288 of 464), respectively. There were 8.0%, 0.3%, 6.3%, 1.0%, and 4.5% cases in which TB alone, TB+ipsilateral SB, TB+contralateral SB, TB+t-SB, and TB+n-SB would have missed csPCa, respectively. All hypothetical schemes, with the exception of TB+contralateral SB (p = 0.063), significantly outperformed TB alone in terms of csPCa detection (p < 0.05). As for the multi-focus cohort, which included 48 cases, none of the non-index lesions had a higher Gleason grade than the index lesions within the same patients.
conclusionTB+ipsilateral SB might be the optimal biopsy scheme for detecting csPCa. As for the multi-focus cohort, the biopsy of the non-index lesions provided limited pathological information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37036488What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.