Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37036411›Full record

ArticleGenetics2023

A gene-level test for directional selection on gene expression.

Laura L Colbran, Fabian C Ramos-Almodovar, Iain Mathieson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ancient DNA and Human Physiology.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura L ColbranDepartment of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Fabian C Ramos-Almodovar
Iain Mathieson
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training Program in Genomic MedicineT32HG009495 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Katherine L. Nathanson, Bogdan Pasaniuc · 2017 to 2026
$4.2M
Polygenic prediction and evolution of complex traitsR35GM133708 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Iain Neil Mathieson · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG009495NHGRI NIH HHS T32HG009495NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most variants identified in human genome-wide association studies and scans for selection are noncoding. Interpretation of their effects and the way in which they contribute to phenotypic variation and adaptation in human populations is therefore limited by our understanding of gene regulation and the difficulty of confidently linking noncoding variants to genes. To overcome this, we developed a gene-wise test for population-specific selection based on combinations of regulatory variants. Specifically, we use the QX statistic to test for polygenic selection on cis-regulatory variants based on whether the variance across populations in the predicted expression of a particular gene is higher than expected under neutrality. We then applied this approach to human data, testing for selection on 17,388 protein-coding genes in 26 populations from the Thousand Genomes Project. We identified 45 genes with significant evidence (FDR<0.1) for selection, including FADS1, KHK, SULT1A2, ITGAM, and several genes in the HLA region. We further confirm that these signals correspond to plausible population-level differences in predicted expression. While the small number of significant genes (0.2%) is consistent with most cis-regulatory variation evolving under genetic drift or stabilizing selection, it remains possible that there are effects not captured in this study. Our gene-level QX score is independent of standard genomic tests for selection, and may therefore be useful in combination with traditional selection scans to specifically identify selection on regulatory variation. Overall, our results demonstrate the utility of combining population-level genomic data with functional data to understand the evolution of gene expression.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingGenome-Wide Association StudyGene ExpressionGenetic DriftGenomeHumansSelection, Geneticevolutiongene regulationhuman evolutionquantitative geneticsselection

Identifiers

PMID37036411
PMCPMC10213495
OpenAlexW4363645536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.