Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37036351›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023

Overestimation of Amphotericin B Resistance in Candida auris with Sensititre YeastOne Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: a Need for Adjustment for Correct Interpretation.

Maria Siopi, Ilektra Peroukidou, Maria-Ioanna Beredaki, Bram Spruijtenburg, Theun de Groot, Jacques F Meis, Georgia Vrioni, Athanasios Tsakris, Spyros Pournaras, Joseph Meletiadis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of EarlyAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Clinical Outcomes of Micafungin and Anidulafungin inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Predictors ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Candida auris MIC testing by EUCAST and clinical and laboratory standards institute broth microdilution, and gradient diffusion strips; to be or not to be amphotericin B resistant?Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2025
    Article
  19. The multidrug-resistantCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Review
  20. Cerebrospinal Drain Infection byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria SiopiClinical Microbiology Laboratory, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Ilektra PeroukidouClinical Microbiology Laboratory, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Maria-Ioanna BeredakiClinical Microbiology Laboratory, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Bram SpruijtenburgDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Theun de GrootDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jacques F MeisDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3253-6080
Georgia VrioniDepartment of Microbiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Athanasios TsakrisDepartment of Microbiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-0656-4715
Spyros PournarasClinical Microbiology Laboratory, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Joseph MeletiadisClinical Microbiology Laboratory, "Attikon" University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-8869-1509
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant variation in minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) has been reported for amphotericin B (AMB) and C. auris, depending on the antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) method. Although the Sensititre YeastOne (SYO) is widely used in routine laboratory testing, data regarding its performance for the AFST of C. auris are scarce. We tested AMB against 65 C. auris clinical isolates with the SYO and the reference methodology by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The essential agreement (EA, ±1 dilution) between the two methods and the categorical agreement (CA) based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s tentative breakpoint of MIC ≥ 2 mg/L were determined. The SYO wild type upper limit value (WT-UL) was determined using the ECOFFinder. The modal (range) CLSI growth inhibitory MIC was lower than the SYO colorimetric MIC [1(0.25-1) versus 2(1-8) mg/L, respectively]). The CLSI-colorimetric SYO EA was 29% and the CA was 11% (89% major errors; MaE). MaE were reduced when the SYO WT-UL of 8 mg/L was used (0% MaE). Alternatively, the use of SYO growth inhibition endpoints of MIC-1 (75% growth inhibition) or MIC-2 (50% growth inhibition) resulted in 88% CA with 12% MaE and 97% CA with 3% MaE, respectively. In conclusion, SYO overestimated AMB resistance in C. auris isolates when colorimetric MICs, as per SYO instructions and the CDC breakpoint of 2 mg/L, were used. This can be improved either by using the method-specific WT-UL MIC of 8 mg/L for colorimetric MICs or by determining growth inhibition MIC endpoints, regardless of the color.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidiasisAmphotericin BCandidaCandida aurisHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAmphotericin BAntifungal Agentsamphotericin Bantifungal susceptibility testingCandida aurisepidemiological cutoff valueresistanceSensititre YeastOnewild type upper limit value

Identifiers

PMID37036351
PMCPMC10269614
OpenAlexW4363645309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.