Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37036230›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2023

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster.

Jessica M Holsopple, Shannon R Smoot, Ellen M Popodi, John K Colbourne, Joseph R Shaw, Brian Oliver, Thomas C Kaufman, Jason M Tennessen

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Duration-dependent mild heat stress attenuates mercury-induced Neuroreproductive and oxidative toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster via hormetic mechanisms.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid acceleratesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Conserved Molecular Responses to Arsenite Exposure inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Iridoids fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Arsenic toxicity in theFrontiers in toxicology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Arsenic impairsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica M Holsopple *Department of Biology, Indiana University; Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, Department of Biology, Indiana University.
Shannon R Smoot *Department of Biology, Indiana University.
Ellen M PopodiDepartment of Biology, Indiana University; Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center, Department of Biology, Indiana University.
John K ColbourneSchool of Biosciences, University of Birmingham.
Joseph R ShawO'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University.
Brian OliverSection of Developmental Genomics, Laboratory of Biochemistry and Genetics, National Institute of Diabetes and Kidney and Digestive Diseases, National Institutes of Health.
Thomas C KaufmanDepartment of Biology, Indiana University.
Jason M TennessenDepartment of Biology, Indiana University; jtenness@indiana.edu.

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Drosophila Functional GenomicsZIADK015600 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI OLIVER, BRIAN · 2009 to 2025
$23.9M
Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human industries generate hundreds of thousands of chemicals, many of which have not been adequately studied for environmental safety or effects on human health. This deficit of chemical safety information is exacerbated by current testing methods in mammals that are expensive, labor-intensive, and time-consuming. Recently, scientists and regulators have been working to develop new approach methodologies (NAMs) for chemical safety testing that are cheaper, more rapid, and reduce animal suffering. One of the key NAMs to emerge is the use of invertebrate organisms as replacements for mammalian models to elucidate conserved chemical modes of action across distantly related species, including humans. To advance these efforts, here, we describe a method that uses the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, to assess chemical safety. The protocol describes a simple, rapid, and inexpensive procedure to measure the viability and feeding behavior of exposed adult flies. In addition, the protocol can be easily adapted to generate samples for genomic and metabolomic approaches. Overall, the protocol represents an important step forward in establishing Drosophila as a standard model for use in precision toxicology.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterAdultAnimalsFeeding BehaviorGenomicsHumansMammalsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID37036230
PMCPMC10247286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.