ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2023
Does non-metastatic gastric cancer of the cardia warrant a different treatment strategy?
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative management of gastric cardia cancer and precancerous lesions: prospects and mechanistic rationale for Banxia Xiexin Tang.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive analysis of risk factors and nomogram development for predicting hepatic metastasis following radical resection of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Reply to: Striking a balance: Deciphering the dilemma of treatment equivalence in cardia gastric cancer.Journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultimodal treatment strategies with surgery as its centerpiece have been accepted as the standard of care in nonmetastatic cardia gastric cancer (CGC). There remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal multimodal treatment strategy.
methodWe queried National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016 to identify patients with resected nonmetastatic CGC who received perioperative chemotherapy (PEC), postoperative chemoradiation therapy (POCR), or postoperative chemotherapy (POC). A subgroup analysis was performed in optimally treated patients defined as initial chemotherapy within 45 days of diagnosis, resection within 45 days of diagnosis, negative margins, adjuvant chemotherapy within 90 days of resection, and standard radiation dose (45 Gy). Kaplan-Meier, Univariate analysis (UVA), and Multivariable analysis (MVA) were performed.
resultsWe identified 2387 patients. Median survival was 38.8 months in the PEC group, 36 months in the POCR group, and 32.3 months in the POC group (p = 0.1025). On UVA, patients treated with PEC had an association with improved survival (HR, 0.83; p = 0.037) when compared with POC. On MVA, no significant difference was noted in overall survival (OS) between PEC, POCR, and POC, similar to subgroup analysis of optimally treated cohort.
conclusionOS rate in nonmetastatic CGC is not significantly different between patients receiving PEC, POCR, or POC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.