Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37035862›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2023

Management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study.

Camilla Hoffmann Merrild, Hans Christian Kjeldsen, Ioanna Milidou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla Hoffmann MerrildCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg Ø, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2444-3311
Hans Christian KjeldsenLægefællesskabet Grenå, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Ioanna MilidouDepartment of Child and Adolescent Medicine, Gødstrup Regional Hospital.ORCID 0000-0003-2640-7848
Aalborg University · DKAarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaltreated children have many long-term consequences throughout their lives, but often maltreated children are not recognised in time by professionals. General practice could be central to the early recognition of child maltreatment due to the long-term relationship with families.

objectiveHow do general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) deal with suspected maltreatment in children below 18 years of age, and which factors influence them to report cases to social authorities. DESIGN AND

settingA mixed methods study set in general practice in Denmark. METHOD AND SUBJECTS: We combined data from a nationwide questionnaire with observations from five clinics and 20 interviews with GPs and PNs. We explored our data using the concept of uncertainty as a driver that shapes action and decision-making in general practice.

resultsMost GPs (94%) said they would discuss cases of suspected child maltreatment with social services, but in many cases they would prefer to discuss their suspicions with a colleague first (83%) - most likely where there are no clear-cut signs. The qualitative data added nuance to these findings by highlighting the difficulty of communicating across sectors, the importance of maintaining a connection with the child's family, and practicing watchful waiting.

conclusionGeneral practice has an opportunity to act early in cases of suspected child maltreatment if uncertainty is accepted as a critical part of the process of reaching a diagnosis. Communication across sectors is key, as is support for GPs with suspicions and for families in need of help.Key pointsGPs are often thought to underreport child maltreatment but despite low levels of reporting, this does not mean they ignore it.Building on the connection with the family, making follow appointments, and discussing suspicions with colleagues are typical of how GPs manage suspicions of child abuse.Accepting uncertainty as a condition of raising the alarm could help GPs to act quickly to support children at risk of abuse.

Indexed as

Child AbuseGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersChildChild WelfareFamily PracticeHumansabusechild healthdiagnosticsmaltreatmentPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID37035862
PMCPMC10088924
OpenAlexW4321494489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.