Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37035860›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiology and imaging2020

Iterative versus non-iterative image reconstruction methods for sparse magnetic resonance imaging.

Gengsheng L Zeng, Edward V DiBella

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiology and imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gengsheng L ZengDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, 729 Arapeen Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, USA.
Edward V DiBellaDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, 729 Arapeen Drive, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, USA.
University of Utah · USUtah Valley University · US

Funding

Reducing Metal Artifacts in Clinical X-Ray CT via Image Reconstruction TechniquesR15EB024283 · NIBIB · WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZENG, GENGSHENG · 2018 to 2022
$644k
NIBIB NIH HHS R15 EB024283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using under-sampled k-space data is a common method to shorten the imaging time. Iterative Bayesian algorithms are usually used for its image reconstruction. This paper compares an iterative Bayesian image reconstruction method that uses both spatial and temporal constraints and a non-iterative reconstruction algorithm that does not use temporal constraints. Three patient studies are performed. It is interesting to notice that the images reconstructed by the iterative Bayesian algorithm may introduce more bias than the non-iterative algorithm, even though the images provided by the iterative Bayesian algorithm look less noisy. The bias can be reduced by decreasing the influence of the temporal constraints.

Indexed as

analytics reconstructionfast MRItomographic image reconstructionunder-sampled measurements

Identifiers

PMID37035860
PMCPMC10081148
OpenAlexW3048932468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.