ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut-Centric Multi-System Regulation byNutrients · 2026Review
- Evaluation of dietary Bacillus-based commercial probiotics in broiler chickens.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Emerging prospects of Bacillus species in attaining the sustainable development goals.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial and Nutritional Potentials ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluated the effects of dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis and Pichia farinose mixture (BPM) on growth performance, apparent ileal digestibility, cecal bacteria counts, small intestinal morphology and digestive enzymes activities, and jejunal nutrient transporters gene expression in broiler chicks. Methods: A total of 768 one-day-old Ross 308 broiler chicks were randomly Q18 assigned into 3 groups based on the initial body weight (42.00 ± 0.08 g). The experimental periods were 35 days. There were 16 replicates per group and 16 birds per cage. Dietary treatments included a basal diet supplemented with 0, 0.1, or 0.2% BPM to form CON, BPM0.1 (consisting Bacillus subtilis with 1.0 × 107 viable spore and Pichia farinose with 1.0 × 107 viable spore per kg diet), and BPM0.2 (consisting Bacillus subtilis with 2.0 × 107 viable spore and Pichia farinose with 2.0 × 107 viable spore per kg diet) groups. Results and discussion: Dietary supplementation of graded levels of BPM has positive effects on growth performance of broiler chicks, manifesting in the increase of body weight gain during days 1-35 as well as the decrease of feed conversion ratio during days 1-7, 21-35, and 1-35. Moreover, BPM supplementation positively improved ileal energy and crude protein digestibility, increased Lactobacillus counts, optimized intestinal morphology, enhanced intestinal digestive enzymes activities, and upregulated jejunal SGLT-1, GLUT-2, and PEPT-1 expression. Therefore, BPM supplementation improved growth performance of broiler chicks, which was partially related to the improvement in intestinal nutrient absorption capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.