Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37035724›Full record

ArticleHealth information science and systems2023

Detection and explanation of anomalies in healthcare data.

Durgesh Samariya, Jiangang Ma, Sunil Aryal, Xiaohui Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health information science and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Durgesh SamariyaInstitute of Innovation, Science and Sustainability, Federation University, Berwick, VIC Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1042-7804
Jiangang MaInstitute of Innovation, Science and Sustainability, Federation University, Berwick, VIC Australia.
Sunil AryalSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC Australia.
Xiaohui ZhaoInstitute of Innovation, Science and Sustainability, Federation University, Ballarat, VIC Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth of databases in the healthcare domain opens multiple doors for machine learning and artificial intelligence technology. Many medical devices are available in the medical field; however, medical errors remain a severe challenge. Different algorithms are developed to identify and solve medical errors, such as detecting anomalous readings, anomalous health conditions of a patient, etc. However, they fail to answer why those entries are considered an anomaly. This research gap leads to an outlying aspect mining problem. The problem of outlying aspect mining aims to discover the set of features (a.k.a subspace) in which the given data point is dramatically different than others. In this paper, we present a framework that detects anomalies in healthcare data and then provides an explanation of anomalies. This paper aims to effectively and efficiently detect anomalies and explain why they are considered anomalies by detecting outlying aspects. First, we re-introduced four anomaly detection techniques and outlying aspect mining algorithms. Then, we evaluate the performance of anomaly detection techniques and choose the best anomaly detection algorithm. Later, we detect the top

Indexed as

Anomaly detectionAnomaly explanationHealthcareOutlier detectionOutlier explanationOutlying aspect mining

Identifiers

PMID37035724
PMCPMC10079801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.