ReviewFrontiers in physiology2023
Conduction system pacing in pediatric and congenital heart disease.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical and electrical outcomes of conduction system pacing versus right ventricular pacing in atrioventricular block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Left bundle branch area pacing in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of feasibility, safety, and outcomes.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Pediatric Pacing from Proximal Right Ventricular Septum: Preserved Left Ventricular Systolic Function at Follow-Up.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Permanent Cardiac Pacing in Children: A 30-Year Follow-Up Retrospective Study in a Single Pediatric Asian Center.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Article
- Dyssynchrony-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Children: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Contemporary Management.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
- Conversion from cardiac resynchronization therapy to left bundle branch area pacing in a child with congenital heart disease and pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: A case report.HeartRhythm case reports · 2026Article
- Advancements in pacing and ICD technologies: Potential implications for complex congenital heart disease in adults.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2026Review
- Comparison of His Bundle and Left Bundle Area Pacing in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Disease Patients: A Single-Center Experience.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- [Device treatment in adults with congenital heart defects].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2026Review
- Immune and non-immune congenital heart block: a tale of two very different entities.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Conduction system pacing in heart failure: Time for a paradigm shift?Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Left bundle branch area pacing in children: case series.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Conduction System Pacing in Pediatrics and Congenital Heart Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conduction system pacing (CSP) has evolved rapidly to become the pacing method of choice for many adults with structurally normal hearts. Studies in this population have repeatedly demonstrated superior hemodynamics and outcomes compared to conventional pacing with the recruitment of the native conduction system. Children and patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are also likely to benefit from CSP but were excluded from original trials. However, very recent studies have begun to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of CSP in these patients, with growing evidence that some outcomes may be superior in comparison to conventional pacing techniques. Concerns regarding the technical challenges and long-term lead parameters of His Bundle Pacing (HBP) have been overcome to many extents with the development of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP), and both techniques are likely to play an important role in pediatric and CHD pacing in the future. This review aims to assimilate the latest developments in CSP and its application in children and CHD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.