ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2023
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the bladder: Computed tomographic features.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor of Urinary Bladder With Partial Cystectomy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Diagnostic challenges and clinical management of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a retrospective case series study.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Clinical features analysis of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors of the retroperitoneal and genitourinary system.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic Partial Cystectomy for Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor of the Urinary Bladder.IJU case reports · 2025Article
- Update of Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy for ALKCurrent treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- New Perspectives in the Treatment of Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor with ALK Translocation: Case Report.Case reports in oncologyArticle
- Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the urinary bladder: A systematic review of the literature and report of a case.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare tumor with intermediate biologic potential, in which lack of understanding often poses difficulties in preoperative diagnosis and treatment. The aim of the present study was to characterize the computed tomography (CT) features of the bladder IMT. The CT images of nine pathologically confirmed bladder IMT were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent both unenhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT. The diameter, location, contour, growth pattern, margin, boundary, density and enhancement pattern of the lesions were assessed. The mean Ki67 value of an irregular blood clot was 18% and that of no blood clot was 12%. A total of eight (89%) patients had one tumor and 1 (11%) patient had multiple tumors. An endophytic growth pattern was observed in 4 (44%) patients, an exophytic growth pattern in 2 (22%) patients, and a mixed growth pattern in 3 (33%) patients. The tumor manifests morphologically as either polypoid (n=5), or cauliflower-like (n=1) soft-tissue mass with a wide base in the cavity, or a limited thick-walled (n=3). The tumor margins were smooth (n=8) or lobulated (n=1), and the tumor boundaries were either clear (n=7) or ill-defined (n=2). The lesions showed either ring-shaped (n=3) or heterogeneous (n=6). The polypoid and cauliflower-like soft-tissue mass showed a symmetrical change in the center of the lesion after enhancement. The bladder IMT is mostly a single polypoid nodule in the superior wall, mostly endophytic growth, with ring-haped enhancement and symmetrical change after enhancement as its characteristic manifestations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.