ArticleJournal of Raman spectroscopy : JRS2019
Bone quality assessment of osteogenic cell cultures by Raman microscopy.
Article in Journal of Raman spectroscopy : JRS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring In Vitro Mesenchymal Stem Cell Osteodifferentiation via Vibrational Microspectroscopy: A Review.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in Monitoring Stem Cell Status and Differentiation Using Nano-Biosensing Technologies.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Hydroxylapatite and Related Minerals in Bone and Dental Tissues: Structural, Spectroscopic and Mechanical Properties from a Computational Perspective.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Radiation-induced changes to bone composition extend beyond periosteal bone.Bone reports · 2020Article
- Raman spectroscopy links differentiating osteoblast matrix signatures to pro-angiogenic potential.Matrix biology plus · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The use of autologous stem/progenitor cells represents a promising approach to the repair of craniofacial bone defects. The calvarium is recognized as a viable source of stem/progenitor cells that can be transplanted in vitro to form bone. However, it is unclear if bone formed in cell culture is similar in quality to that found in native bone. In this study, the quality of bone mineral formed in osteogenic cell cultures were compared against calvarial bone from postnatal mice. Given the spectroscopic resemblance that exists between cell and collagen spectra, the feasibility of extracting information on cell activity and bone matrix quality were also examined. Stem/progenitor cells isolated from fetal mouse calvaria were cultured onto fused-quartz slides under osteogenic differentiation conditions for 28 days. At specific time intervals, slides were removed and analyzed by Raman microscopy and mineral staining techniques. We show that bone formed in culture at Day 28 resembled calvarial bone from 1-day-old postnatal mice with comparable mineralization, mineral crystallinity, and collagen crosslinks ratios. In contrast, bone formed at Day 28 contained a lower degree of ordered collagen fibrils compared with 1-day-old postnatal bone. Taken together, bone formed in osteogenic cell culture exhibited progressive matrix maturation and mineralization but could not fully replicate the high degree of collagen fibril order found in native bone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.