ArticleHeliyon2023
Learning metric volume estimation of fruits and vegetables from short monocular video sequences.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Destructive Volume Estimation of Oranges for Factory Quality Control Using Computer Vision and Ensemble Machine Learning.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Amount Estimation Method for Food Intake Based on Color and Depth Images through Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a novel approach for extracting metric volume information of fruits and vegetables from short monocular video sequences and associated inertial data recorded with a hand-held smartphone. Estimated segmentation masks from a pre-trained object detector are fused with the predicted change in relative pose obtained from the inertial data to predict the class and volume of the objects of interest. Our approach works with simple RGB video frames and inertial data which are readily available from modern smartphones. It does not require reference objects of known size in the video frames. Using a balanced validation dataset, we achieve a classification accuracy of 95% and a mean absolute percentage error for the volume prediction of 16% on untrained objects, which is comparable to state-of-the-art results requiring more elaborated data recording setups. A very accurate estimation of the model uncertainty is achieved through ensembling and the use of Gaussian negative log-likelihood loss. The dataset used in our experiments including ground-truth volume information is available at https://sst.aau.at/cns/datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.