SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2023
Effectiveness of immunosuppressant use for the treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced liver injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modulating drug response through the gut microbiome: pathways to precision therapy.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Balancing act: Tapering mycophenolate mofetil in immune checkpoint inhibitor hepatitis-strategies, outcomes, and risks.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Infliximab is a safe and effective treatment in steroid-refractory immune-related hepatitis.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- High Grade Hepatotoxicity From Dual Checkpoint Inhibitors Is More Common in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Than Other Cancers.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Article
- [Several issues and considerations in the clinical diagnosis and treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated liver injury].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Development of a Predictive Model for Classifying Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Liver Injury Types.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Immune-Mediated Liver Injury From Checkpoint Inhibitor: An Evolving Frontier With Emerging Challenges.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Review
- Updates in the pathogenesis and management of immune-related enterocolitis, hepatitis and cardiovascular toxicities.Immuno-oncology technology · 2024Review
- PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor - Related Adverse Events and Their Management in Breast Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2024Review
- Immune-mediated liver injury from checkpoint inhibitors: Best practices in 2024.Clinical liver diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune-mediated liver injury caused by checkpoint inhibitors (ILICI) is a challenging clinical management issue. Although immunosuppressants are widely used to manage ILICI, no large-scale studies have proved definitive evidence for the most effective form of patient management. Aim: Analysis of the effectiveness of immunosuppression for immune-related liver injury. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes of immunosuppressive treatment of ILICI patients. A literature search of PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane Library was completed for dates from 2000 to January 1, 2022. The primary outcome was the response rate to immunosuppressive therapy for ILICI, with subgroup analysis based on the type of cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen, and severity of liver injury. The secondary outcome was the median time to recovery from ILICI with immunosuppressive therapy. Results: A total of 30 studies that included 1120 patients were collected. The pooled ILICI response rate was 79% (95% CI 0.73-0.84) for treatment with corticosteroids and 93% (95% CI 0.79-1.0) for treatment with mycophenolate mofetil. For ILICI treated with corticosteroids, the median recovery time was 47.59 (95% CI 39.79-55.40) days compared to 37.74 (95% CI 31.12-44.35) days for all forms of immunosuppression. Conclusion: Findings support the effectiveness of corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of ILICI. The identified median time to recovery is a beneficial guide for patients and physicians, allowing for realistic expectations and appropriate treatment management. Future prospective randomized controlled trials are required to define a standardized management approach to immunosuppressive therapy of ILICI. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022313454.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.